masculistuk

Kate Green

2012-02-03T12:54:00.001-08:00

..has a vagina.

The above smug perkin is Kate Green an"MP" from the UK. Getting her face in the press this week for tackling the worlds woes by getting her vagina all moist and squelchy over the Totty Beer disaster in the House of COMMONS (get it Kate?).

You see like so many vaginas, Kate thinks she is the bastion of sensibility and superiority and felt that the most abhorrent picture on the Blond Totty beer pump was enough to get herself some brownie points with the small and un-representaive group of women who think they speak for woman kind. I have to say Kate, I wholeheartedly agree with you. Anybody who takes the time to paruse my satirical offerings will know that I am a genuine equalitarian and would be pointing at my vagina if men were equally objectified.

(Points at vagina!)

But that is where the problem lies. You see I can show the inequality with regard to objectification and proffer countless examples on this blog where men are far more objectified than women and the degree of objectification is far more severe. Whereas Ms Green, who is in a position of privilege, does not give a shit for anything other than gaining herself some modicom of publicity by saying 'women' a lot. But she is only tomorrows chippy paper. Whereas she could forget her personal hidden agenda and go and do something like creating jobs for people or getting to do something for under achieving boys or even getting to know what real women are like. Then she may realise that it is men who should be afforded some empathy for having to sit in a workplace or a pub or bar and endure women sexualising, objectifying and vilifying men just like, yes JUST like some men do about women.

Kate.... WOMAN UP!

(No vagina was hurt in this presentation)

NEW ERA

2012-01-03T09:06:00.000-08:00

Happy New Year Gents.

What an uninspiring year 2011 turned out to be. We saw the same endless misandrystic attitude towards men whilst women wallowed in the self anointed cloak of victimhood.

2011 was filled with endless reports of violent women, woman who murder, female child abusers, husband batterers. sexism, objectification and double standards, females teachers abusing boys and girls along with the plethora of male orientated reasons for womens’ downfalls at every opportunity the year ended as it started. It was filled with hysteria over a small handful of women getting moist and angry over beauty pageants until one ‘feminist’ thinker declared it to be OK as those in the pageant were ‘clever’ women. To the women who complained ay Melanie Sykes' image in the Metro newspaper as being sexist as she was exposing her stomach, but failed to acknowledge that men are indeed more likely to be objectified than women. Indeed the aforementioned rag will often display modesty protected fully naked men without a flutter of an eye by women and men.

Its such the norm for men to be naked on TV and in films, much more likely to be fully exposed and of course you will always see that men are topless on hot days. Why oh why does society have such a problem with topless women yet allows men to do so. Well of course it is because you have been conditioned to think it was wrong and have not heard men bleating on about it being objectification. So women think they own such matters. And they don’t. This is the time to do more than moan on such blogs forums about what angers you. Go out and challenge. Plant the seeds in womens' minds that enough is enough.

During 2011 I have heard such comments like phwoar nice arse and endless other sexist comments coming from womens mouths. This of course does not surprise me despite me working for a respectful organisation. What this really proves is that ‘feminism’ achieved nothing. Nothing at all. It proves that the women are just people like men and totally equal. As such are as likely to behave like people do. Forget the smug faked superiority from women MP’s who have deluded themselves that they can change the world and that they represent women. Do they fuck. Women MP’s have proven to be cowards and I annoint them all, particularly the Labour nutters, with a white feather.

What you can do is to challenge sexist behaviours of all description but especially from women. Only today a female colleague threatened me with a smack in the mouth if I took a post it from her desk again. Whilst said in jest I equally in jest suggested I would smack her right back. Of course this raised a smile from my colleagues because we nomally must accept such comments from women. If we collectively challenge all behaviours we can really change this sick notion of acceptability. It’s not about loosing your sense of humour its about fairness. It’s not machismo that renders you silent at such times, it is permitted acceptabilty. Change comes now. If you don’t then there is no point challenging all the issues that affect men and not just my personal gripes but all matters.

I have changed so many peoples minds on our matters including many women as well as men. What is pleasing is that underneath it all I find that most people are in agreement and support men’s issues but I see that it is apathy that has allowed misandry to become the norm.

As is step down from my soap box I would thank you for your time and for taking the time to read my blog. I know I can be off the wall but the passion, and the drive is 100% sincere.

Look at our world. Everything we do, take for granted, use in our daily lives, the medication we take, the cars we drive, the peace we have, the planes in the sky, the trains running under sea, the roads we drive on the paths we we walk on, the pioneering fathers of the new world the houses we live in the skyscrapers and ancient dwellings in our cities. In fact practically everything comes from men and their toil. Ignore the fact that a couple of decades of so called equality has equalised men and women. It has not. In two thousand more years men and women will not be equal in such terms. Women make an amazing contribution to home and family which is their nature. There are women today equally doing well in a mans world but it is a tiny footprint on top of mountain that is the achievement of man. Never forget it. Walk tall and be proud. Ignore lying sexist comments like its a mans world but behind every great man is a great women. What does that mean? It is merely a pacifier that allows women to take some credit for achievements of men, Even a TV programme dedicated to the women who were behind the astronauts who allegedly landed on the moon as though it was down to them.

Wake up men. You are magnificent. Stop being a shrinking violet. Don’t be demasculised but lying notions of womanhood. Be proud speak out and look at life and thank the great men of the last two millenia who have transformed our lives and how we live. And they did it for all mankind.

And finally, a correction to a much overused lie from women. It is men who give life not woman.

Vagina anyone?

2012-01-01T10:50:00.000-08:00

Now before any of you think I am going to make yet another gay blog think again. No this hung gentleman was in Spartacus:Blood and Sand TV series that I happened to catch the other day.

My reason for posting this picture and un-censored contrary to my normal high standards is as follows. First of all, this is a prosthetic penis so I am sparing the actors modesty. This series seems to appeal to the gays immensley and now I see why. Before I go on it is fair to say that from the odd snippet I have seen a full naked female with her pubic hair and his genitals on display. Note what I said then? You see if we were to actually see female genitals the actress would have to lie back and spread them. I also acknowledge that if I men had a vagina and women a penis I would be saying that the same thing in defence of female exploitation but I would point out that the male genitals were on the inside. But what is sickening far more than the above image is the way in which society automatically lends itself to double standards. Let me whine on..

In September I had an interesting conversation with the Gas man who came to service my central heating. I guess I should really say Gas Service Personnel now as we know that 50% of gas men are now women!!! Well erm I did have one gas woman once but to address her with the privilege of womanhood would have resulted in me getting the TV acceptable slap in the chops as she was more masculine than me. So the gas man is complaining about a recent event he attended where toilet facilities had been set up. These included the old fashioned Urinal out in the open with no screens around it. Today I am much braver in addressing such double standards as my fellow man is wakening up to the huge double standard and inconsitency associated with being a man. He was pissed off ( intentional) as he was required to have a pee within a few feet of people men and women walking around. He had even taken a picture. I didn't ask for a copy as it may have looked well dodgy, but there it was with no regard for a man's right to privacy. This lead on to a really interesting conversation about the kind of things I express on here. So some awakening is taking place.

The most annoying thing is that many actors (actors are male actresses is female) are required to fully expose themselves these days. That Cumberbatch person was on Jonathan Ross who was laughing at him as he could see he was playing with his cock to make it look bigger when he appeared out of a bag on some west end play. Can you imagine seeing an actual vagina in a play or on TV? I know there are lies and myths but they are just that. Can you imagine an actress required to stimulate her vagina in order to make it look more ready to take a cock? Which is the female equivalent of the erection. Can you imagine a programme with OAP Michael Parkinson walking around a naked girl with her legs open staring at her aroused vagina bemoaning it to be the true last Taboo? No of course not. This was that old feminist bird Joan Bakewell acting smug and superiour in front of a handsome man penis erect. Presumably she was squeeking round that room unless she has dried up completely. Yet this is what is happening today. The above image is increasing. There are websited dedicated to catching an actors penis and displaying it as some kind of trophy. English actor Matthew Leitch even got it out got it hard and wanked in some gutter film called Sabor Tropical. Following the cum moment Leith cries. Probably realsied he was not doing a porno and his dear mummy will have to watch him cracking one off. (No prosthetic there!) But my biggest concern is behaviours. Why do women act

Boys are denied opportunity to be educated in a manner that enables them to achieve with the preference being given to girls. Why not educate seperately? We have boys denied the opportunity to do anything just with boys (which is perfectly natural) in case some vagina wants to join in safe in the knowledge that she is afforded both opportunites. We have misandrystc TV shows like Loose Wimmin who can objectify and vilfy men safe in the knowledge that most men are out at work and apethetic. This Christmas, the vile Denise Welch entered the Guinness book of world records for kissing as many scantily clad men dressed as father christmas as she could. The old slag! men were never afforded such joyous pleasures.

Make 2012 the year you challenge and speak out. For now.... see ya.

Katheryn Roach

2011-11-06T06:14:00.000-08:00

PERVERT

Yet another pervert and in the BBC report attached, we are required to accept that somehow her behavior was justifiable due to the break up of an affair she was having. So once again a man is blamed for the actions of a woman. And once again, the BBC cannot believe that a woman could do any wrong. If this was a male teacher behaving towards a female pupil the misandrysts would be out pointing at their twats and asking for the death sentence to be re-instated. There would of course be less of a commotion if his victim was male. Hence the reason I love being an true equalitarian.

http://tinyurl.com/c7dlb9n

FIONA DONNISON

2011-10-28T12:13:00.001-07:00

CLICK TO READ

We all know the western media cannot cope with the notion that women can be erm bad, but stories like this piss me off big style. Troll kills child and there just has to be some reason why. Well there is of course a reason why ANYBODY WOMAN OR MAN kills a person, But the media just has to find an excuse. A man is just evil but a woman is ill or driven to it with a whole host of pathetic excuses to justify female crime let alone murder. Yet pick up what the English attempt to pass as newspapers and it's clear to see that they are not fearful of reporting on women who are paedos like GREER or murders abusers thieves etc etc. But it just hasn't got the capability of admitting that women are just as likely to commit crimes as a man. You just have to see how rough British women are when out and about, see who starts the fights see who becomes the victim when some sensible person gives an out of control troll a deserved slap.

Still some growing up to be done Britain.

Deborah Hunt - yes HUNT!

2011-09-07T10:29:00.000-07:00

This woman is 43!

This troll got lashed and drove 20 miles on the wrong side of the motorway. Of course, it is because she had split from a man so it is really his fault and it is he who should be jailed.

Hunt, 43, (really?) was on her way to take a part in the latest Shiela's Wheels ad. Julie Bindel was not asked to comment. Really BBC?

Copy and paste.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-somerset-14820305

Melanie Cole

2011-08-22T11:03:00.000-07:00

KILLER

Presumably a man made her do it!

Copy and paste.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-14615261

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2024168/Melanie-Cole-49-befriended-William-Reilly-91-beat-death-wine-bottle.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

Hattie - BBC

2011-01-22T10:42:00.000-08:00

I'm not sure if you saw the brilliant BBC drama recently 'Hattie' The story of the 5 year affair Hattie Jacques had with a young man.

There were many good things about this drama, especially the brilliant Ruth Jones. But also the clever way that the sex scenes were filmed without the usual naked shots of man clothed female. In fact it was filmed in such a way that there would have been little embarrassment watching this with the family. Shame the BBC weren't so generous when filming the Kenneth Williams story with full male frontal exposure.

That aside, what was also noticeable was how chivalrous John Le Measurer - Jacques' husband was when discovering his wife's sordid affair. For let's face it, he could have thrown her out of the home, slapped and scratched her face, kicked her in the groin, tore up her clothes, placed an advert in the Times saying what a two timing slut she was, maybe even wished she would go to prison where she would be raped in the showers by the biggest dyke going.

One cannot help feel that there is a double standard in this world. (Ahem!) Yet when a man has an affair there is the assumption that the woman is single thus rendering his existing partner as the victim. Yet in this case, Jacques' husband allowed a friend to take the blame to save her face.

Of course the truth is that a woman is just as likely to have an illicit affair as a man. Yet it is social apathy that allows misandry to take over. To somehow render the man speechless. Times are changing. Even I am seeing the tide turn. (What I am not seeing is Google adding the word misandry to its spellcheck)

Was Hattie a Cunt? No! She was just a woman.

ANOTHER BLAIR CUNT

2011-01-05T12:01:00.001-08:00

Cunt

On this misandry I am so sickened I ask you do an internet search as I did not keep the link.

Having sadly survived swine flu, this cunt awarded a murderer a bravery award for murdering her husband. Therefore Blair presumed the innocent man who had not stood trial was indeed guilty based upon the word of the murderer. Why did we stop the ducking stool?

HELEN MIRREN CUNT

2011-01-01T13:51:00.001-08:00

Helen Mirren is a nasty talentless piece of shit.

I recall years back when it got an oscar for deep throating some producer or other how she demanded more writing for women. Tell ya what slut face, go get your pen and paper and write yourself. Who the fuck do some women think they are demanding all the time. "Do" not demand/ There is nothing holding you back. Except your a looser.

Of course it has been shouting its vile slutty gob off again recently referring to young male actors as penis's. Oh Helen, having a cunt as deep and as smelly as yours and any woman would want a penis. But you know you're an old age pensioner and a rank one to boot. Go to Slutsville Pensioners Home and allow young men to be young men without sad old talentless loosers like your cunting self having to pur your vile bile on to them for being something you can never be...... young.

Still alive?

GERMAINE GREER CUNT

2011-01-01T13:41:00.001-08:00

CUNT (click on it if you want to vomit)

Everyone knows Greer is a cunt and clearly has a rank overused one by checking the none self objectifying picture above. But did you also know that Greer reckons if a little boy was sexually abused by a woman and he got aroused (like which boy wouldn't) he is asking for it and thus making the woman abuser innocent. I guess this is no surprise considering she is here showing her cunt off to the world. Therefore I presume she is suggesting a home for the aforementioned juvenile phallus.

The ducking stool isn't good enough for this perverted old cunt. One day she will be surrounded by flames in hell. I for one cannot wait!

SPOT THE MISSING WORD.......

2011-01-01T13:37:00.001-08:00

CLICK

Paedophile

2011-01-01T13:34:00.000-08:00

If straight men were like the gays

2010-12-26T06:09:00.001-08:00

Louise Yeoman - Dykey Pedo

2010-11-21T10:30:00.000-08:00

Click to read about Louise Yeoman Dykey Pedo slut

Harriet Harman is a biggoted cunt.

2010-11-01T03:02:00.000-07:00

Takes boot out of mouth and inserts in biggoted cunt.

Harriet Cunt Harman proves once again she is nothing more than a sexist biggoted cunt and needs a good firm boot in her rank little cunt. Here Harman is being a biggoted cunt about a Scottish MP. Thank heavens we have an EQUALITIES 'minister'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-11658228

Daran Little

2010-09-07T10:35:00.000-07:00

Perverted objectifying gay (Click)

I'm told that gay writer Daran Little added a naked young male to Eastenders on Monday because he thinks he is fit. (See his tweet) So how much proof do you need to know that the whole naked man on TV thing is a vail so that they can have a massive wank.

Does saying the actor is a good sport make it OK? Nah, its Daran Little's way of making him feel justified knowing he did it for his own gratification.

Sadly this passes as acceptable when a woman or gayboy admits to objectifyng men. As though it was their right. What DOES the BBC standard for? Should it be GBC?

Could there EVER be a woman naked in front of a group of screaming men a la Heineken or just acting like men? On any show even? Red nose day is coming and no doubt the GBC is planning to have two male strippers again!

When Becca stripped off for Max we saw a knee and a shoulder. Some equality!

I feel sick!

Heineken

2010-09-05T07:45:00.000-07:00

The new ad for Heineken is hilarious and for once shows up the pathetic behaviour of some women. Like most men, we have actually seen this over inflated immature childish behaviour towards certain things like the shoes in this ad. So to do what I advocate, that is to reverse the situation, in this instance really pays off.

Well done Heineken.

Pankh

2010-09-05T07:34:00.001-07:00

Click

I watched an Indian film last night. The film is called Pankh. To be quiet honest I got rather tired during the film because it was hard to watch what with the camera constantly spinning. But I watched it because it caused huge controversy in its very superior native India. You see an actor was required to get completely naked in the story. A huge no no in India and rightly so. So I was amazed to see that the guys butt is actually blurred out in the film.

Good on ya I say. All too often this rot creeps into talentless writing as an opportunity to exploit. Particularly young handsome men on Anglicised TV. So sorry Mr Winterbottom, being a pretentious cunt and speaking bollocks will not always win. Sometimes standards carry more weight than your shite drivel about your sad little old porn flick.

Woman's arse shock (Almost)

2010-09-05T07:17:00.000-07:00

Fuck me a straight bloke nearly got a look in.

Well almost. A new ad for some shite arse scrub actually showed nearly a full female arse cheek. Quite possibly there would have been tantrums at the advertising agency as some little cunt would have been hammering on about it being a bloke who is washing his bell end with it and blah blah blah. But no. The heterosexual majority seem to have been given partial consideration for a change.

Hey I know what could happen next. Mrs Partial butt cheek suddenly runs out of the arse scrub and she goes a naked running down to Asda to get some more. Brilliant! I should be in advertising!!!!

A 'Feminist' with a brain?

2010-09-01T09:53:00.000-07:00

I happened upon this clip on YT and just had to download it. For once, a feminist who has a brain. What she says about Hilary Cliton is correct. So many 'wimmin' feel they have to look act and behave like men as they wallow in their muffy misandry. So many 'wimmin' who profess the desire for equality want nothing of the sort ain't that right Harman!!!!

Harriet Harman is voting for Dianne Abbott to be the Labour Party leader because they both have a vagina. Ain't sisterhood brill!

Male Rights Network

2010-08-24T12:11:00.000-07:00

If the owner of the MRN Blog still views mine, please message me on here. I would like to regain access to your blog mate.

Cheers

MUK

Channel 4 - Penis Obsessed Perverts

2010-08-22T04:45:00.000-07:00

Embarrassed?

Does this fine young man look embarrassed? He surely does and I can tell you why. The batty boy perverts that run Channel 4 (UK) are constantly seeking to look at mens penis' and in this instance this poor lad was used to solve the question that every lad I have ever known has raised in countless questions over and over again. How do i measure my penis. So thank the fucking Lord above that Channel 4 feels it is the bastion of the penis and got this lad in a situation with his mates, safe in the knowledge male tribalistic ritual will guarantee that the queerios will have something to wank over for a time to come.

Yes this young man dropped his pants and had his penis measured. Phew! I could hear the sigh of relief from 30 million men who had this question burning on their lips. The sigh of relief from mates across the nation as they now new that they were no longer going to be asked how to measure the penis ever again thanks to Channel 4

This was of course nothing other than sheer bollocks (pardon the irony) as I have yet to meet anybody who has discussed this with me. I have never in my whole life considered asking a mate just how to do this and none of my mates have ever asked me. I am sure there are very few men who have never actually measured themselves and I am guessing that the ingenious male will consider a variety of options to consider. But I am guessing he will use the one that gives him that extra centimeter or so. But to proffer this as a burning question on C4 and to include it in an embarrasing bodies programme shows a desperate TV Channel willing to do anything to gain a viewer or three. So I can assume that there is a little room at C4 called Penis and when one of the fairies has an idea as to how they can justify another penis shot they pop in and put it in the suggestion box.

©MUK

Leonardo DiCaprio - Victim

2010-08-22T04:44:00.001-07:00

Clicjk to read.

Female Singer had sex whilst HIV

2010-08-22T04:42:00.001-07:00

Slut?

2010-08-22T04:29:00.000-07:00

I am totally opposed to all levels of circumcision. Always have been and always will be. I think it is child abuse to circumcise a boy carried out by deluded paedophiles. I do not apologise for my view. never have done and never will do. To cut the flesh of a new born baby boy is heralded as a passage of rites for some poor victims. Even you English introduced it to the USA in order to prevent boys doing what nature insists they do.

Yet here we see the proposal to criminalise those who do this on girls. Why just girls? Surely the level of violation committed on baby boys is comparable to more abhorrent than rape and its pedo practitioners rapists. Yet apathy raises its misandrystic head when ever anybody dares to criticise this practise. There are those misandrysts who feel that it should be carried out to protect women for fucks sake. Yet clearly the vagina harbours as many if not more germs than the penis. But we just don't touch on that do we. We never address that as it puts women in some kind of lower ranking to suggest that such a thing were possible. Some vaginas are like a road traffic accident and I have yet to hear a discussion at work about the smell coming from a man's penis when he is at the loo. Yet there are several women at work who have gained notoriety for the smelly slots to the utter disgust of the majority. So maybe there IS an argument for circumcision? Or maybe just the acceptance that god made us in this way for a reason and water is intended to give life and cleanse.

©MUK / Metro.

Woman Killer Shock

2010-08-22T04:27:00.000-07:00

Click to read.

ITV This Morning - Gay.

2010-08-08T04:15:00.000-07:00

ITV HOMO

Take ITV's This Morning. Get a small group of predominant women from 10 - 80 some with cameras. Get some handsome models in trunks, dunk them in water and check that the trunks are not transparent, fallen off or revealing genitals. Mix together = harmeless fun!

Take ITV's This Morning. Get a small group of predominant men from 10 - 80 some with cameras. Get some pretty models in swimwear, dunk them in water and check that the bikini bottoms are not transparent, fallen off or revealing genitals. Mix together = Sexist exploitation and would never happen.

TV is just too gay and men say nothing about it. We have this type of sexist shit day in day out. Of course men aren't going to complain because they are out at work or behave in a conformist stereotypical way. Which is why the men in the crowd thought it funny. You see this poor lad found the pants nearly split him in two and were transparent when wet. Oh well, men don't need privacy do they?

So come on ITV, lets have maybe a wet t shirt contest with sexy babes. They won't even have to be topless like their male counterparts. Come on lads! lads? Why you running away. Who's being sick? It's only women lads!

Oh well!

©MUK

Labour party?

2010-07-31T11:32:00.000-07:00

Well the world has certainly continued to turn since my break began. Misandry is still alive and well and living in the labour party.

The new government arrived and one of the first things I read was that they were going to make it illegal to reveal the identity of a man accused of rape. Then vile cunts like Flint and Cooper were quick to beat at their nasty hairy little vaginas and plead the case to criminalise innocent men if it protects the oh so precious wimmin they so badly wanna fuck. Yet Cameron gave in to the pressure. So you've already lost one of your stripes Cameron.

Begs a real question. What kind of bullshit do these creatures spout when they are touting for votes? And what kind of man would ever put a cross next to any of these scum.

I pity them.

The REAL last tabboo

2010-02-21T14:32:00.001-08:00

Click

There is this stupid notion that has existed for an age. A myth to beat all myths and a lie to beat all lies. Gentlemen I give you the VAGINA! Ah the VAGINA. The true last taboo. Whilst misandrysts like Bakewell are given licence payers money to objectify a handsome young man standing naked and sexually aroused whilst she squelches her way around him staring at his genitals acting smug and superior as is the misandrysts way. Yet increasingly the above mentioned member is becoming more of an expectation to please the gays and some girls. There is a fog of a myth about yester year. A myth that needs challenging and autheticating, Benny Hill did not have naked women in his show nor did he bugger them on air but you could be forgiven for thinking that so is the venom that even today can be bestowed upon him.

Nanette Newman was not required to wash her gash in the fairy liquid advert and no actress was required to expose her genitals even to this day. Yet when we are exposed to a strip of pubic hair in the Harold and Kumar Guantanimo movie, there is a call to bring back the death penalty so can the extremity of vocal disapproval of such audacity. Yet I have seen a penis in two movies this weekend alone. Shutter Island and City of God. Never mind the BBC2 'comedy Bellamy's People (yes really although I didn't see the program) A new low for the BBC.

I did see a vagina in the film Import Export today. I have to say it was not being penetrated (the female version of erect i.e sexually aroused) and I did record the film purely to see what equality looks like. There was a penis too for those interested.

Yet there is nothing other than notions such as about time too from some members of the proletarian masses. And theirin lies the problem. That is the root of the myth. Those very thoughts conjure up memories that exist in the realms of the imaginations of those for whom I am beginning to greatly admire. Yes really! For as I advance in years and witness the bile that comes from the lips of Greer and Jeffries do I realise that I have so much passion and love for my brothers of this world that I too tend to equate them into the realms of victimhood just as they do. My passion for my brothers however does have more validity and I can proffer fact as opposed to fiction or myth to prove the reality that makes my angst. But I have decided I don't want to deny the gays their rights to objectify every male actor required to strip off in their agenda filled crap that fills our schedules. But as a true equlitarian, I think the balance should be addressed. So the hetero men and maybe some Lezza women could be afforded a bit of the oh so hard to find tit or heaven forbid a strip of pubic hair or at the very least the naked woman arse!! But to demand that in every program would surely be oh I don't sexist mysoginistic rape!!

©MASCULISTUK

I am an evil rapist and a rape victim!

2010-02-15T12:05:00.000-08:00

CLICK

Have you noticed as more and more truths are revealed that more and more myths are generated? In this sad little story, we read that one in four women have been raped. Is it not high time that we began to have honest reporting and not tittle tattle?

I cannot imagine what it must be like for the real victims of rape. The men and women who are violated in the most abhorrent way. I cannot imaging how sick they feel, particularly those for whom reporting this nasty incredible disgusting vile act is something they cannot face up to. Only to have those who proffer the notions of rape when a women 'dutifully' gives in to the wants of her husband or the man who gives to his wife when he doesn't want to? Yes I include men in this. For some strange reason, the notion of this kind of rape, the dutiful rape still only applies to women. Yet is the issue penetration? is the issue penis, or want or desire?

2010, the great new decade has kicked off firmly as it seemingly will continue. Misandry! Pure and simple. Misandry is the new toy to play with. Not that its new of course. Heterosexual men may as well just go and commit mass suicide. Because the shite that passes off as journalism has found a new target. hetero men.

Look at the way British shite papers have demonized John Terry, Tiger Woods and more recently our very own Vernon Kaye (whose crime was a cheeky text on Twatter for fucks sake!!!! See a later rant!)

Listening to Radio 4 on the crawl home the other week and PM offered us the opportunity to listen to some rank old misandrystic lezza and bollock traitor mangina proffering their opinion (like it really mattered) on the John Terry issue. I mean what the fuck does it have to do with anybody never mind a misandryst and her muff hating pet? I mean are there no wars taking place for god's sake? Are British and US soilders not blowing up innocent people in Afghanistan in your name? Is the economy suddenly so shit hot under this vile misandrystic government (for it most certainly is).

Anyway back to the original rant. The point being fematwats, that some women are now being honest and saying don't lead him on! WOW! A bit of sense. I mean you wave a red rag at a bull and it reacts. You turn the key in your car ignition and the engine fires up in the hope of shooting off. So thankfully, sense prevails and somebody has the oh I don't the cervix to actually stand up and say, ya know what, we have some involvement in this matter too.

Real women!

©MASCULISTUK

Get yer tits out for the lads!

2010-01-30T14:07:00.000-08:00

Phwooooooooooooooooar!!!!!!!!!!!

Ah ha! Eureka!!! I have at last gained confirmation about a long held belief,albeit from two heterosexual males. I don't believe in objectifying people, no really it's true! And I have always been against a certain behaviour men seemingly feel they have to do in certain situations. The 'phwooar I'd give that one' scenario that men feel duty bound to display in front of their mates when looking at the Sun or any other tit mag! And these magazines go right against the foundation of my belief.

However, my opinion has changed recently. What with the fact that you cannot avoid naked men on TV and topless men in the streets and on beaches and at the pool. And the fact that women are required to cover up their nipples whereas mens are OK and the fact I am still waiting for at least one female naked scenario on TV. Therefore I think them to be relatively harmful in comparison to the double standard associated with this regard.

However, my two mates agreed, that they have indeed carried out the phwoaaaring at an opportune moment because they felt they had to and who can blame them? It's the nearest thing to some kind of acceptable brotherhood. Whilst it may not be to my liking, at least there is something that unites men. Some way to go but getting there.

©MASCULISTUK

Beckham Sexually Assualted!

2010-01-30T13:51:00.000-08:00

I'm sure I don't need to say anything here do I? OK, if you insist!

Let us just state the facts. David Beckham was sexually violated by a women in the name of comedic entertainment. Like so many who have responded to this, I am pleased to see that the majority feel likewise.

MARK SIMPSON Feels it was somehow acceptable as Mr Beckham (he suggests) displayed the goods to the world and it was only a matter of time. Mark is a homosexual commentator and he will often come across as a quite pleasant chap. But it is high time that men came together and stopped performing off one another in a manner that clearly demonstrates the desire for tribalistic superiority. Hence the most base manner in which men can often treat one another.

©MASCULISTUK

Lies lies and More Lies

2010-01-30T13:41:00.000-08:00

Surprisingly not about Tony Blair. But the questioning of the lies that perpetrate to form fact in the UK 'newspapers.' I wasn't asked for my opinion and none of the men I know and asked were either. Yet it is proffered as fact.

The time has come to stop this kind of opinion forming 'news' that serves to demonize, unfairly criticize or indeed criminalize (Harman Smith McTaggart) any group that is unable to collectively represent itself in order to give riposte to such fabrication.

©MASCULISTUK

Wonderful women!!!!

2010-01-12T10:35:00.001-08:00

Clickable pics.

A few samples from the recent press.

masculistuk.

PENIS v VAGINA IN MOVIES

2010-01-08T12:47:00.000-08:00

Clickable

I was searching the net and wanted to prove a point to myself. Now I know, because this favors the exploitation of men over women, it would be the usual smug and superior fematwats whine to accuse me of raping them. But interestingly, this Google find would indicate more references to the subject of Penis in movies over Vagina. By a whopping 4 million. Surely it can't be correct. But the findings are there to see. Note I said indicate. II mean we all KNOW that feminists use LIES to get their points across. But this is not a lie but a Google search. At least I have something to back up my findings as opposed to opinion and belief to prove my cause.

The irony of this find however is the first one on the penis list. A list on Amazon on the hard to find penis in films. (wake up batty) Typically by a homosexual man and equally unsurprisingly not a list of vagina movies. Hmmmm!

©masculistuk

Mr Penis Homage

2010-01-02T05:48:00.000-08:00

I smell perversion

Below is a homage to Mr Tom Ford, the penis and self obsessed 'designer' and 'film maker' and pratt! As I have mentioned before. Ford reckons the penis is akin to breasts and wants to debate why penis is not on everything from his corn flakes to TV station identifiers. Ford uses feminists whinging to give strength to his argument. He goes on about women being used to sell products and demands that men are stripped of any dignity so he can bust a nut with his boyfriend and all the other gays with their brains in their undies. Of course, only Ford has used vagina in his promotions so I guess he is a bit of a masculist as well as a total arse.

PERVERT!

©MASCULISTUK

Domestic Violence

2009-12-20T03:58:00.000-08:00

Ah it's a slow awakening this one. I saw a program on TV that highlighted the 2 million reported incidents of female to male domestic violence (2005 I believe) which highlighted many brave men telling their stories, and one who was killed by his girlfriend. The truth has been slow to come out but it is. Vaginas love being the victim and will always give excuse for anything that is contrary to their vile lies.

These women really let their genda down when they condem only female violence and keep their mouths shut when talking about anything other than themselves.

In the clip below, we see a man who has been stabbed with a chisel, the wife admits it yet he is presumed guilty too and arrested. If people really think that women need to be prompted or encouraged to be violent and aggresive then they are clearly living in another world. Women love to be perceived as the victim. Women ain't stupid. They are aware that the world favours them, that the law favours them, that men are brought up to protect them and know the vast majority of men would not hit a woman. Yet watching TV recently, one could be forgiven for thinking all men were violent towards women including me so powerful is the message. But like so many such matters, only one side is ever heard, only one presumption is ever made. As we see in this video clip......

©MASCULISTUK

Sexist Bitch - Weakest Link

2009-12-20T01:33:00.000-08:00

Troll

Watching the BBC's Weakest Link recently, I was amazed, yet not surprised, by the smug sexist comments made by the winner of this edition. Quite clearly, this swamp donkey has started to believe some of the lies and myths that come from fematwats mouths. But note how humble and polite the man is. Something that cannot be said for the big headed troll who won.

Proof that feminists are ugly chauvanistic biggoted deluded liars.

©MASCULISTUK

Skinny Models - Gay issue.

2009-12-19T14:25:00.000-08:00

Spot the difference ?

Karl Lagerfield's play thing!

So I'm chatting to a girl mate at work the other day and I was telling her the reason why the fashion world likes to have its skinny waifs and how heterosexual men are somehow to blame for this. She agreed with me including the widely known fact that designers are invariably gay.(Tom Ford? REALLY?) and that the use of waif like skinny models is because the clothes are sent around the world for previews and its a cost saving exercise.

Anyway, Lou made a real good point I had not thought of. The designers are trying to make the girls look like boys! Why did I not think of that. It's plain to see and makes so much sense. After all, they are usually sad middle aged or older gay men cracking one off over their little rent boys that they attach themselves to, safe in the knowledge that heterosexual men will be blamed for this abuse as is always the case.

Their world is sickeningly sad and filled with arse licking pretentious sycophants who will do anything to raise their profiles. Street hustlers these boys ain't, but getting paid to be a sexual fantasy for gay designers is getting paid for your appearance and for taking your kit off. One and the same thing to me. And as Mr Lagerfield said, he only has the highest class male escorts.

©MASCULISTUK

Karen Brady - Chauvanist

2009-12-19T14:03:00.000-08:00

Chauvanisticly Sexist!

There has been some debate recently about women coaching or managing men's football teams for fucks sake. Will there be nowhere where men can go without some fucking woman bleating on about her vagina and demanding 'equality' for it? I fear such women are all latent homosexuals who, like many feminists, are thoroughly pissed off that they do not have a penis and are striving to be a man whilst denying real men the opportunity to BE one.

On the ONE Show (BBC - Batty Boys Club) this week, Karen Brady declared her triumph after leaving Birmingham FC with a 75% female board. The sexist bitch. This is where vaginas always slip up. Equality? No way! Favouritism priority and preference! So much for equality there Brady. You should be ashamed of yourself. Still I am now convinced that you would thoroughly review this and proffer support for any man wishing to enter the female game at any level (including a tit washer? Oh we have seen it all before!) This is why women can be offered the illusion of equality and empowerment but the real leaders of the world, the men, will never allow them just to walk into their world and just take over from here.

I think it is really important that there is a distinction between men and women and that they are afforded the opportunity to spend time with their respective genders without the interruption or interference of Venusians.

I would applaud men for their patience in the past. Now I think they are just pathetic wimps to allow such shit to go on around them whilst women are offered both sides of the gender to play with as they will.

©MASCULISTUK

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/talking_point/4110845.stm

You think times are changing?

2009-12-14T12:33:00.001-08:00

This is what a paedophile looks like

CAROL CLARKE - PAEDEOVILE

Nah! Truth will always out regardless of suppression. Two stories this weekend that continue the journey of eventual truth we all so badly deserve. (copy and paste)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/lancashire/8405031.stm

On the one instance we have two girls whose false allegations and lies have, it is believed, caused the premature death of an innocent man.

And the other story is that OF PAEDOPHILE CAROL CLARKE OF GRIMSBY! Who was sent to prison for being a nasty evil paedo (despite that word not been published on the BBC) (copy and paste)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/humber/8412861.stm

Whilst it is tragic news for the mentally ill feminists and the misandry media as a whole, it is good that the floodgates have opened with this regard. Hardly a week goes by now when we are offered the truth about women. It is so hard for them to swallow as they prefer to wallow in their own self anointed notion of victimhood.

Even recently on the BBC's Biq Question, a misandryst was suggesting that there be a register for those men who have been accused (as opposed to found guilty of) domestic violence. When she was hit in the face with the truth about male victims and it was suggested women too should be on there, the bitch didn't even blink. For she does not give a fuck about domestic violence as a whole. All she gives a fuck about is vagina.

A sad sad day for feminists and a great time for man, For men are the foundation of life and the builders of everything we humans dwell upon.

©MASCULISTUK

PERVERTED WOMAN

2009-10-25T10:27:00.000-07:00

Victim of trespass and peeping tom.

If we ever needed evidence that the law in the US is gender biased here it is. A man in the US goes to make a coffee in his own home at 5:30 am naked, a woman who with her seven year old son crossed his yard and has the audacity to call the police. Not only is US law and its law makers as basically misandrystic as its forefathers English counterpart. Let's ask a few questions here:

What was the woman doing;

a. trespassing

b. Peeping Tom

c. with child at 5:30 am.

I recall the double standard associated with this kind of infantile prejudice as a young man. In the reverse the the man would be arrested as a peeping tom and she would probably be in some kind of victim support program.

Why was the trespassing peeping tom not named in this report? Why was she trespassing and looking into private property with a child at 5:30 am. I think it is the police who should be arrested for failure to carry out their duty responsibly.

A pathetic world which discriminates in favor of vagina over penis. Yet it is penis creating the laws, Apathy reigns again.

©MASCULISTUK

Caster Semenya

2009-09-12T04:43:00.000-07:00

Click

Caster Semenya is the South African runner with questionable gender. Clearly from the pics above, one could be forgiven for thinking the picture had been edited in some way. There is no doubt her genitals are female; i.e inside her and yet her facial structure and lack of breasts and the 6 pack would indicate either a man, a heavy presence of the male hormone or something else. Recently, the 'something else' is in the news. The potential for her to be a hermaphrodite and even citation that she IS indeed a hermaphrodite is in all the news at this time.

What strikes me most about this case, is just how it is being treated so sensitively because she has a vagina. Oh I dunno, I kinda reckon that if this was a bloke, he would be ushered into a room and required to get his genitals out in front of a group of suited men AND women ffs and all would take a look, tick a box on an official sheet and that would be the end of the matter. Now wouldn't equality be great?

©MASCULISTUK

TOM FORD

2009-09-07T07:57:00.000-07:00

DANIEL CRAIG IS HE OR IS HE NOT?

2009-09-07T06:55:00.000-07:00

I'm just not sure about Daniel Craig. I had heard reports that he wanted to do nudity to make up for women's nudity in film. (Oh for fucks sake which planet is he on?) And then I heard that he wanted to do less and was uncomfortable ( I take the oh for fucks sake back). Then I found two snippets that contradict themselves (see above). Which is it Daniel? Do you think you should do a full frontal because some woman had to do partial nudity (rendering yourself a sick mangina) or are you a little uncomfortable (rendering yourself human?) and maybe we should try quality writing for once.

Tell you what, why not do this. In the age of equality (be it equal or Harriet Harmanised equality) why not have a vagina exposed for every cock exposed. Then we will have no exposure at all and we can get on and enjoy the film and stop talking about

©MASCULISTUK

PENIS GOOD VAGINA BAD

2009-09-07T03:34:00.000-07:00

In this clip we see a Northern English lad in some weird eastern Europe porn house. He is challenged to partake. In this scene he was fucking the woman and pulled out as condoms were chaffing. He pulls back to reveal a blurred out vagina. He walks away and turns back to camera and we see his semi erect penis no blurring required hey? A man so it doesn't matter. Lets just not offened women hey?

Apologies for the penis and quality.

©MASCULISTUK

KILLER

2009-08-25T11:31:00.001-07:00

CLICKABLE

Yet another bastion of womanhood doing her bit for vagingakind!

masculistuk

FALSE ALLEGATION

2009-08-25T10:49:00.000-07:00

CLICKABLE

Yet another bastion of womanhood does her bit for vaginakind!

Masculistuk

FIONA McTAGGART

2009-08-24T09:41:00.000-07:00

Click for proof that misandry DOES make you fat and ugly!

McTaggart hasn't got the balls to deal with real criminals. Much easier to criminalise innocent men!!

Boot misandry where it hurts! Out of office!

BBC TRAFFIC COPS AUGUST 2009

2009-08-22T11:28:00.000-07:00

On Friday 21.08.09, the BBC broadcast a program called Traffic Cops. I just managed to catch the end and SKY+ the clip I want to show you.

Clearly, we see evidence of the fact that it our immature police to find it amusing that this officer a member of the public was hurt in the genitals. This clear double standard just backs up everything I say on the matter. Imagine this was a woman! I know, you just simply can not!

Even more worrying it the fact that the humor associated with this is so deeply ingrained in men that even his mate laughs!

I will be writing to Hampshire police as I feel it is important to address this matter. Despite any opinion, the young man was innocent until proven guilty. It is just evidence of the lax attitude UK police have regarding the public they serve.

©MASCULISTUK

Evil Vaginas

2009-08-22T10:45:00.000-07:00

Clickable

Stuart Feltham

2009-08-21T11:14:00.000-07:00

Whilst we all know that the Brits are relatively incapable of behaving themselves when they go abroad and make an utter show of themselves and bring shame upon themselves, their friends, family and countrymen, nobody deserves to be attacked.

Stuart Feltham (unfortunate I know) was attacked by a local Greek woman whilst on vacation. He was set on fire and his assailant alleged he was trying it on with her. Of course the British gutter (press) seemed to gloat on this story it being ftm violence and made reference to his genitals being burnt. Whereas the truth of the matter is the serious crime against him by the cunt Maria Fanoudaki. Fanoudaki could serve 5 years in prison for this and well she should. It seems the British gutter are only up in arms when the victim is female and poke fun at the attack on Feltham, who, I have to say, does seem to be the victim here.

What would Harman do?

©masculistuk

Male Nudity

2009-08-18T11:08:00.000-07:00

clickable

I am not alone!! It is so refreshing to see at least one other person has the same view as me. I(Not me btw. I am equally as vocal on that website but this posting was new to me.)

Note the double standards. Let's call it Harman effect!

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=770327

©masculistuk

EASTENDERS BBC CONDONES FTM VIOLENCE

2009-07-26T08:40:00.000-07:00

Here we see the huge double standard when it comes to the portrayal of dom violence on TV. I complained to the BBC about this episode. They responded with their usual dire trible of Shirley being fiesty and wishing to explore issues. Shirley should have been twatted back by minty. Why would the BBC not explore that?

©MASCULISTUK

The Gay way.

2009-07-26T05:57:00.001-07:00

The Gay way.

2009-07-26T05:55:00.000-07:00

DAVE WILKINSON - CLASSY MALE MODEL

2009-07-26T00:28:00.000-07:00

I was doing my usual surf of sites and happened upon some comments from a young male model which were so obviously a response to the gay predators after his cock. Good on him I say. Pleasingly, there was a majority of support for him and his comments which is refreshing and filled with hope of change.

©MASCULISTUK

TORCHWOOD

2009-07-12T11:25:00.000-07:00

Not another woman's arse!! Oh no its John Barrowman! PHEW!!

Rank gay shite Torchwood minced on to our screens last week for a five epsiode special. And what a pile of total shite it was. Homosexual writer, Russell T Davies has been spotting womens arses again on his TV. Now I know I have mentioned before that RTD's remote is stuck on the playboy channel but honestly Russell, we never see women's arses on TV. They all have sex clothed have you not heard? So you're still sulking that C4 didn't let you make the actors have full penetrative sex in QAF. Get over yourself. This didn't stop RTD getting his best bud and fellow homosexualist person John the plastic surgeon ain't seen my face baby Barrowman get his clothes off again! It was unbelievably bad and like watching an episode of Grange Hill from the 80's but with really bad acting. (Which, was superb for its intended audience and I bow down in front of the genius Phil Redmond)

The BBC boasts itself as the largest oldest and richest broadcaster in the world. Yet it seems hell bent (intended) on permitting this totally badly acted and written drivel grace our screens in its prime slot for five nights. I mean with all that wonga you think they would find some real writers, maybe even the odd straight one. Maybe then they could put some money into a real good TV show. Something along the lines of The Wire, Dexter, Prison Break, Lost etc etc etc. The BBC has milked dry the Dr Who / Torchwood RTD pantomime. Make something serious and stop pandering to old gay manginas whose sole mission is to create wank fodder for himself and its sad little bed fellows. What with ITV being totally un-watchable, I cannot give up on the Beeb just yet. But it won't be long.

©MASCULISTUK

Domestic Violence

2009-07-05T12:43:00.000-07:00

An interesting news report from ABC US. Clearly proving the general apathy regarding violence towards men. We see this in everyday life and in the movies on TV etc. Thank heavens that the clever females intervened. The police officer should be disciplined or even fired. He is on duty 24/7 and bound to protect the public. Unless its a man seemingly.

Violence towards men is so common in all media and in life that we are desensitized into reacting. As the most vulnerable gender in society, nobody seems to care about male victims. Easier to put the effort in with women as if that was somehow more abhorrent.

Watching two movies last night it was clear what would be more upsetting in these two movies. I am Legend and No country for old men. In I am legend, Will Smith is required to strangle his dog as it succumbs to the virus that has modified humankind. As he begins the camera pulls up to Will's face. Whereas in no country for old men, as the main character strangles the police officer we are shown his death in all its glory.

Think act and speak out.

©MASCULISTUK

Good mother

2009-07-05T04:58:00.000-07:00

Good teacher.

2009-07-05T04:55:00.000-07:00

click pic

Probably her boyfriend made her do it!

Hotel Babylon

2009-06-29T23:30:00.000-07:00

I caught the stupidly gay BBC Hotel Babylon on anytime last night. Naturally, the heavily gay boys bum club delivered on its promise to continually objectify men.

In this episode, a bomb goes off in London and the hotel is besieged by people needing a room for the night. In this scene, the chamber maid knocks on this mans door. There we see his six pack in all its glory. As she asks him if he would share his room with a stranger, the towel begins to fall whilst his face changes to that of the ' need you ask - typical man' look, as seen in the pic above. Cut to the naked shot of him standing in front of the fully clothed female. Been there before?

Some kind of pattern emerging here. It is almost inescapable and totally exploitative to use this in nearly every British (and US) TV programme. No longer can the feable excuse of female exploitation be used as an excuse. Females were never used in mainstream TV like actors are required today so that ends the matter. Now lets end the gay rot! Afterall. without any doubt, the heteros take over and theres naked women in front of clothed men in nearly all dramas, clothed men having sex with naked women and a classroom full of boys watching a naked female cover her bits up a la Hollyoaks. You know, just heterosexual instead of gay tv. There would be an outcry.

©MASCULISTUK

Belgian Girl Tattoo

2009-06-24T10:29:00.000-07:00

Jesus Fucking Christ!

I recently chuckled when I heard the sad story about the Belgian girls who fell asleep whilst she was given 50 odd tattoos when she only asked for 3. I chuckled because quite clearly, Kimberley Vlaeminck was lying through her sad little teeth. Oh was I a feminist and Kimberely was Karl and the tattooist was a woman and the whole stroy would be very different. And irrespective of anything, Kimberely is still deemed to be a victim in this whole episode. Even if only of her own stupidity.

But then I got a little concerned. Because here we have a young lady who was prepared to lie and blame an innocent man for her stupidity. This infantile misandryst will agree to a tattoo and then, after the event, declare she did not give her permission and thus rendering the tattoist a violator and her the victim. Then I thought where have we seen this behaviour before? When?

When will this misandry stop? When every little lolita is brought up with standards. When their mothers instill into them that lying is wrong, that false rape allegations are misandry and as such render them mentally ill, and when every father stops putting their precious little princesses on a pedestal only capable of being a victim not the perpetrator.

Where are feminists when such matters hit the headlines? Why would this not be anything other than man hating. For to apportion blame on a male for the misdeeds of an immature vagina is nothing other.

And one more thing, just how many times can I get the word MISANDRYST onto this post?

©MASCULISTUK

JAMES FRANCO - Milk (Movie)

2009-06-21T08:46:00.000-07:00

I have to retract the comments I made about this film. First off all, I decided to watch it with a friend. Before we started the movie I was beginning to feel wound up by the notion that what I was about to see was the very thing that makes my blood boil. However, I cannot see at all what James was talking about. The film came with a warning of its sexual nature and violence. There was only one sexual scene (which was a few seconds long and we only had to endure one buttock) and James and Sean retained the dignity that all actors should. So I can only presume that James was talking about the swimming scene where you get to see his butt (OK I will forgive that considering) and then he got out of the pool and the only people who would have seen him were the cast and crew on set. The camera did not pan and his modesty was unusually retained.

Therefore I humbly apologize for ranting on about this film when in fact it was extremely well written acted and directed. I have no idea what James was going on about. Yes he was in many scenes in bed but nothing even my masculist mind would dissaprove of.

Well done Gus Van Sant. I hope you have set a trend.

I'll keep James' comments on as per the original post.

©MASCULISTUK

Edited audio version:

Occupation BBC TV

2009-06-21T00:44:00.000-07:00

Hardly a BBC production goes by without a naked male actor, and the Beebs most recent offering, Occupation was no exception.

Yet despite the weak feeble excuse for the overly gay BBC desensitizing the masses to the notion of male nudity in every aspect of life, the mini series was refreshingly different and proffered an alternative story from the ashes of Tony Blair's mass murder of innocent muslim people.

However, that apart, it was different to what I had expected and was reasonably enjoyable telly despite the BBC's more recent practice of showing a mini or micro series on successive nights.

Oh, its not rocket science that men are required to get their kits off to appease lies of women in TV and film, or sex starved sad old women like Louise Page, producer of Salonika who wanted to rub one off over Paul Fox. Penny Woolcock, with her abysmal The Principles of Lust et al. And now, I have actually discovered the fact that the gays DO indeed change scripts to see naked men. Perverts!

See JAMES FRANCO posting.

Vannessa George - Paedophile.

2009-06-10T11:52:00.000-07:00

This vile paedophile is in the UK news in a high profile story of child violation. I have to say that this is being reported in such a way that it makes no reference or claim alarm that the woman is a paedo. But then she is by no means the first, she will never be the last and she is part of the wider fact that more women abuse children then men, Period! (source nspcc UK)

Is that the sound of heads being buried in the sand? Don't worry ladies, it will be safe to come out for a while soon.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/devon/8093490.stm

A second woman has been arrested in this case. Angela Allen from Nottingham. I'm still amazed, even at this stage, that men haven't been blamed for them doing this. Like they get blamed for all the woes of women.

©masculistuk

Gordon brown is a mysogynist..........

2009-06-07T11:30:00.000-07:00

.....apparently.

Whilst it is common knowledge our 'leader' (UK) has yet to be elected, and gained his position thru nepotism as opposed to oh ya know, something ridiculous like being elected by the people. But let's brush that aside for a while. Apparently, Mr Brown is a misogynist and it must be true because it was on TV and the BBC to boot. Andrew Marr show on Sunday 07.06.09 and a guest review the 'papers' threw this into the fore. Hinting that Mr Brown would prefer to make his decisions in the loo because women are not allowed in there. Now if there was an example of being a little detached from reality considering women just walk straight into mens loos these days as is there misandrist right.

I really tire of this term now. Browsing the net you can see how the unenlightened have just jumped on a bandwagon. In one image search I found a picture of a far eastern Europe / west Russian couple. The female was carrying a heavy load therefore the male was a misogynist. I mean of course. A man approaches the woman to help carry her load and he too is a misogynist. Let's face it fellas, there is little hope that those who anoint themselves with a pigeon hole title of feminist should have been able to grasp that little ditty. Oh I feel some kind of sarcy sexist comment coming on. But hang on. In the same review they were talking about boys under achieving at every key stage (did I or did I not mention this about a year back?) and guess what, some professor from Twitford University thinks something should be done! Hurraaaaah! Hey! How about a two tier system to actually reflect the fact that males and females learn differently as opposed to the sexist current method geared up to positively discriminate the vagina over the penis. Oh that was done years back for that very reason. I know, why doesn't somebody come up with a test to check a child's ability to learn and then teach and assess them accordingly. No genitals being given priority here.

Then.... it goes on, the reality of girls exceeding over boys went on to point out that girls were outnumbering boys in certain fields. After a brief chest beet, the reviewer comments on the lady in congress who does that and has 5 children. What! 5? She a slag or maybe there was a man involved in it and presumably a nanny and a private education in a boarding school. Yeah a real typical woman.

Back to Mr Brown, oh I don't think he is a misogynist, he is just a person and some of his women colleagues are felling bitter and twisted and like so many (but not all) women, have to put the knife in at any given opportune. Just look at the scum (sun) newspapers front page Saturday 6.06.09

ANGLOBITCH

2009-06-07T11:28:00.001-07:00

A website I happened upon.

http://www.anglobitch.com/

CHANNEL 4 WAY TOO GAY

2009-05-29T11:10:00.000-07:00

So a friend contacted me and asked if I had seen Extreme Male Beauty on C4 last night (28.05.09) and I reminded her its not my thing. She went on to discuss it in some detail (yawn) and then she told me what had happened in the previous show.

Basically, Porn Channel 4 felt it appropriate to objectify male genitals so that it can get some much needed viewership thus benefitting sales of drivel in the adverts secure in the mind that nobody would complain (ahem) with the objects being men.

A group of smug women were asked to discuss the penises and say what they liked about them and discussed the merits of male genital mutilation and their shapes and sizes. In fact they were asked to do what Porn Channel 4 would not in its wildest gay dream ever ask of women. I said to my friend (who knows me very well) does the female equivalent programme do likes wise?' Immediately she said 'Oh they would never get away with that!' Ha ah!! She knew I would be on one bless her. And on one I am.

Can you imagine a group of naked women exposing their vaginas to a group of men all smartly dressed observing them as though somehow it was their right. Discussing the merits of the vaginas with the smallest labia or maybe proferring the virtues female genital mutilation as his preferred vagina. Or perhaps the clitoris on this one is too squiggly. Of course not. Of course I ask you to imagine a lot. It's predominantly men who are required to do this on TV so you can only imagine. Imagine real equality. The thing all feminist have never wanted.

Now I know that some people still remove their bras and thrust a match towards them whenever anybody dare suggest that women are NOT objectified in the same way, and quickly wheel out Benny Hill with his bikini clad women. Its worthy of note, that no woman was ever required to be naked on Benny Hill. And I challenge anyone to find a British or US comedy programme where a female was required to be completely naked. I mean completely naked. Heres a few with the men for starters:

Shameless

The Vicar of Dibley

Touch Me I'm Karen Taylor

Two Pints of Lager

Beehive

Horne and Corden

Being Human

The Inbetweeners

and that's just comedy that I am aware of!

©masculistuk

Naked man?

2009-04-25T15:45:00.000-07:00

NO VAGINAS HERE. JUST HANDS AND PUBES. SPOT THE DIFFERENCE!

An edited response to a web posting.

Interesting how the notion of male nudity requires exposure of the genitals whereas the female would not be required to expose her vagina opting for an artily lit scene. Yet the two are sat side by side as a comparison. The over use of the male nude by Tom Ford to sell clothes is a joke. It only proves that gay men think only about their own self gratification and an inane desire to sexualise everything and take ownership of the male nude as their right to view in all circumstances. Ford has the immature audacity to correlate the penis and breasts.

The use of naked male imagery in UK media is out of hand. The BBC cannot make a programme without some actor required to be butt naked either in front of clothed woman acting smug and superiour, in front of his peers who are laughing at his misfortune or in some kind of subservient demeanour as though he himself were there chosen to appease the lies and myths associated with the 'exploitation' of women in mainstream TV of yesteryear. Rednose day 2009 saw not one but two male strip teases. Where's the balance there? Having said that, it would look out of place if a female strip was over seen by a male presenter acting smug and superior when addressing the female strippers.

Only today, watching Ross Kemp in Afghanistan, do we see a poor Afghanistani man injured having his clothes cut off to expose not only an horrific wound but his genitals. Meanwhile, a female victim is shielded by large sheets in respect of the Islamic faith. Yet the man is carried in front of her in front of the cameras his genitals exposed to the west. This is not just about a clear double standard in terms of privacy. This provided those of us opposed to the demasculisation of boys who are raped of the right to choose not to be circumcised with an opportunity to see its effects first hand.

The most private parts of a human being are his genitals. Yet there seems to be a clear double standard with this regard. We have perverted female producers thrusting naked young lads on the stage because they tire of female nudity therefore seeking to gratify their notion of revenge on some poor young man whilst denying any sexual arousal (Salonika WY Playhouse). We have gays demanding that the male nude is so mainstream that he can be used to adverstise breakfast cereal such is the desire. Yet we really have an incoherent ability to differentiate between the male nude, with his genitals exposed and the antonymous pubis whose presence is noticeable by its absence. Indeed, there seems to be a thrust of sexual activity on TV whereby naked male actors are required to simulate sex with clothed or partially clothed females. Even when naked, the genitals are not exposed.

Daytime TV is just a complete melting pot of 'womens' TV (driven by gays) where the women at home watching are required to feel it is their right to demonise men in its US/UK chat shows and drape themeselves with the notion of victimhood. Where the male form is required to be leered at by the notion of equality and empowerment at the drop of a hat. Where lesbian Ellen on Diva TV is required to act hetro to engage with her audience and lust after George Clooney in a swooney girly way. Where Diva TV announcers are questioning the lack of 'sisterhood' following on from a soap opera. Where naked men run to get married having being violated by his so called mates in order to sell a credit card. Where the female slimmers on Richard and Judy are applauded for their efforts whereas the males are coerced into a naked full monty at 17:55 on national TV. following their achievements. Where Dr Pepper seeks to humiliate a boy by having his butt exposed on national TV as part of its 'What's the Worst That Can Happen' campaign completely overlooking the fact that men seemingly expose their butts at the drop of a hat and 'appear' not to be bothered by it. But to use a female in this scenario would be unquestionably true to life. To the UK sleezy soaps and general drama on TV with their persistent desire to have some actor either caught naked, running around the house naked only to be caught by yes a group of old ladies, running through the streets of London naked and the myriad of other occasions that frequent the drivel of English TV.

Seemingly, an actor needs to get himself naked to have any credibility or to remove the shackles of a previous role eg Danielle Radcliffe of the Harry Potter series. But its those who feel this is a passage of rites that male actors have to fulfill in order to achieve credence that have the issue, that have the perversion. They act in shameful disbelief when people discuss the size of his manhood. What else would people do? Particularly when a little modesty would not alter the drama. The very thing that seemingly is the defining pinnacle of a man should not be public fodder. Poor Danielle Radcliffe is all over the internet with interpretations of his nakedness and actually secretly filmed images of himself. By gays of course.

The credibility of a writer is hinged upon the quality of the writing. The absurd scenarios whereby actors get naked are thinly disguised sensationalism in order to achieve notoriety and push boundaries as far as they can. Yet would be incapable of carrying out their own demands themselves.

Porn actor Kieran O'Brien went from mainstream TV to porn and back again. In the film 9 Songs he displayed his erect penis fully penetrated his co star and ejaculated. That is dictionary definition porn. Yet get a main stream director to brainwash his cast into this shameful film by the allure of a false notion of art and challenging boundaries over notoriety and standards, and you can not just get O'Brien to do the part but to also claim his family were looking forward to watching the film. (source Guardian) A perversion that not even the boys in gay porn would probably desire even the ones with the unusual relationships with their mothers. Yet, in contrast, the sex scene in 'Rocknrolla' was a delight of writing excellence and a relief for the actors involved. Yet we clearly got the grasp of their actions without any of Winterbottoms perversions veiled as challenging boundaries and blah blah blah. But that just proves it was an aside to the film and not an opportunity to gain more notoriety as is so often the case. '9 Songs' Winterbottom isn't even gay so it dispels my beliefs somewhat. There again his film is straight porn so no surprises there.

Is it apathy that renders men incapable of challenging not just the inequality of this, not the sensitivities of the young actor who would be deemed anything other than a good sport unless he gets naked. Not the pathetic whimpering of the gays demanding mens genitals on the front of the beano with a centre spread in the dandy. Not the inomprehensibly schizo attitude of inconceivable 'comparisons' to justify the demand. Not the lack of acceptance of the difference between the notion of female and male nudity It's the fact that to oppose any of this renders you a misogynist. Gay desire is the debate. No straight men out there are initiating the debate over the lack of exposed vaginas on TV and in the media in general. Nobody is picking up on the fact that Barbie does not have a vagina but point at Kens lack of a penis. Yet will compare actual exposure with reference as an equality as per the vagina monologues which, I am assured, is not a show for the lovers of pussy. Whilst a seemingly comparable stablemate would be the puppetry of the penis purely because the respective genders genitals are named therein. More sickening is the brainwashed dismissive manner that actors treat this whereas the female counterparts demonstrate their lack of comfort filming such scenes as recently as on the Jonathan Ross Show whereas men like to demonstrate they are taking it in their stride. There is the crux of the problem. Men are designed to retain the emotion with such regard. They would never break the unwritten rule to declare their discomfort in certain situations. They will always declare they are not bothered. Peter Duncan(formerly of Blue Peter BBC TV) even said this as an aside in a production he was in at the Leeds Grand Theatre in the late 80's when he strolled on stage stark bollock naked. 'I'm not bothered' was his response to the gasp from the audience declaring the disbelief and the dismay that the other lead, one Linda Lusardi, got no further down than a basque. Yes, the audience had been duped into attending because they wanted to see her tits and the promo advert declared her name and the use of nudity side by side. There is no correlation between tits and penis. Period.

Yet let me be the first, as a human being to point out, men too are equally capable of feeling discomfort in these situations but their hormones and society tells them to behave in a submissive manner and accept the smug superiority as displayed by women and gays in this situation. Watch how men are portrayed when a woman walks into the showers / changing room on TV and in film (and in life). Jubilant cheers. Watch how women are portrayed iin a similar scenario. Screams.

Lets hear it for the wonder of men. I for one think they are brilliant and society should stop objectifying them to settle a none existent score. A score that rests purely in Narnia, kicking snow with its mates oh and presumably Tom.

©masculistuk

Gay Male Fematwat

2009-04-06T10:38:00.001-07:00

There is nothing worse in the strive for equality than an inequality that is seemingly acceptable due to the fact the inequality is experienced by men. Except one thing. When a man seems to justify it. Well the guy in the clip is so obviously gay and there is some credence in his theories. But where is his brotherhood? Where is his sisterhood? He should be running round clucking and screaming 'I want your dolly I want your dolly!' After all, surely the female models are burning their over priced bras to ensure that their 'male' counterparts are paid equally. Surely the minister for men is looking to change the law to ensure equality. Surely its hitting the headlines on the BBC. No? Surprised? Of course not.

In some respects what he says is likable to the notion of supply and demand. I mean a female footballer would never earn what men do. They will never be playing side by side and the interest will never be anywhere near that of regular football. I nearly said normal! I mean in football, your skill and where you play dictates salary. No jockstraps being burnt at that inequality. At least that's an example. In the fashion world though, the demand may be for women's clothes and the gay designers to throw their fantasy bloke up the catwalk to crack one off later. But thats it. The kind of drivel that is borderline obscene would never be worn by real men. Period. Its purely the gays and the girls. So in that respect, why not pay them the same?

The male model nay bastion for equality in this clip says:

' women have been degraded all their lives (citation needed) you know men have been put on a pedestal over them now in this business women are put over men and that's just the way it's gonna be and men are gonna have to suck it up and handle it or get out of the business. '

Wanker!

Radical Feminist Extremist

2009-03-29T05:15:00.000-07:00

Creature

Imagine that it was somehow acceptable for mentally ill people to proudly profess their illness on TV talk shows like maybe a Pedo proudly declaring her or his illness as the defining nature of themselves.

Gentlemen and Ladies, I present 'Bindell'. The last time I saw this person ( I am being so kind there) was on TV about a year ago. Her blatant hatred for men and normal women was painful if not sickening to watch. I felt physically sick and deeply sorry for her because what was also clear was that it really has a serious mental health disorder. Despite that, I have some real empathy for some of her causes. One of which is 're-claiming the streets for women' (since when did they own them but I get the drift.) problem is, when you have your own agenda, you have to overlook some startling facts. But then Bindell isn't interested in male rape stats and the fact that a man is far more likely to be a victim of crime than a woman, equally likely to be the victim of domestic violence and far more likely to be attacked in the street and murdered. Even if the figure was 999,000:1 male to female victim ratio, Bindell would be beating her muff and spouting on about wimmins issues. That is why sick people like this are greatly disliked by the majority of decent normal human beings because they are rational sensible people. Bindell, do you really think that the majority of people in the UK want to be safe on the streets? Do you really think that the vast majority of victims (men) would prefer not to be attacked in the street? Could you find it in your... erm I dunno I presume you have one, cold as steal beaty thing to ever just ever open your eyes to real issues that affect people Bindell? It's because your so sick that people like me and the rest of the normal humans beings are fucking enraged by your fucking obsession! You're practically a stalker and normal women should sue your fat ass for stalking the fuck out of them. In fact, I'm surprised you ain't been twatted by someone for committing a crime against mankind. yes MANKIND!!

Today it was introduced on the Big Question (BBC UK) as a radical feminist extremist. (WTF) Shame on you BBC. Whilst we know you are Israeli / homosexually biased, you must stop pampering to minorities and represent the whole UK population not minority hairy or camp extremists.

God please help Bindell because boy does she need it. I utterly hate and despise the very breath of people who are so ill that they are rendered totally incapable of anything that is not part of their own agenda. We all know radical femisnist Lezzas really hate their vaginas for not being cocks. Creatures like that should be sent to, oh I don't know, Lesbos and not publicly flaunted like this poor creature is. It's cruel and not 19th century London FFS!

Get real Bindell. Wash your hands, open your eyes and get with our world.

Twat!

MAN GANG RAPED

2009-03-28T13:36:00.001-07:00

CLICKABLE

MAN RAPED BY 40 YR OLD SOLICITOR

2009-03-28T12:42:00.001-07:00

Clickable

Yet another victim of an evil woman has his identity 'raped' by the media. This innocent man had his details announced in the media by the woman who 'raped' him. The 40 year old slag got pissed and had sex with him. The next day, she decided she had been raped. Any woman who alleges rape falsely is equivalent to a rapist and should be named and shamed in the media along with a custodial sentence. She is the lowest of the low and and shame on womanhood. Particularly before the real men and women who are raped and are not too frightened to report the crime.

I don't give a fuck for people like this who can at a whim become a victim of a serious violation at the change of a mind. Just like the femicunts who gather their statistics of victimhood based upon simple trickery questioning techniques the purpose of which is to gather the required outcome. Their sisterhood only exists to further the misandry which is a mere mental health issue affecting any woman or man who professes anything outside of a humanist perspective.

It is such a shame that there a people out there whose self esteem is so low, and, with their maturity licking the gutter of life, need to anoint themselves with the notion of victimhood. This, in order appease themselves for not being lush need to apportion blame on somebody other than their loose slaggy selves for carrying out a deed that in the cold light of sobriety is abhorrent. Most people will have forgotten somebody's name the next day. No need to get angry and bitter. I appreciate that in this case the handsome 20 something will be a reminder of the solicitors middle age. But she should count her blessings that she should get any attention at all, if she is as ugly outside as she is on the inside. Particularly from a lad she is old enough to have given birth to. The slag.

Shame on any woman or indeed man who feels the urgency to profess anything other than contempt for the true victime in these circumstances. The innocent man.

BBC Sleaze Nose Day

2009-03-27T14:20:00.000-07:00

So the time comes for the British people to dig deep into their pockets for the worthy causes supported by RND. On the evening of the big event we are 'treated' to not one but two male strips. Oh it's OK though because its for a good cause. And who gives a fuck that there is such a huge double standard when it comes to this? Anyone?

I maintain a sense of humour but cannot help but feel that the men in society may want to cheer and clap and ogle at young women from the world of TV. They could equally be enticed to sleaze it up for a good cause. I mean, they could keep their hats on and and cover their privates (pubes) with their hands. No? Why? I mean really, why not? I mean the male presenters could act all smug and superiour and treat the women like they were jolly good sports, behave as though the notion of 'having seen it all before' allows for the invasion of privacy and patronize them to ensure they fee that they really had to strip off to have any credibility. They could even wink and make cheeky comments about what was inside them bikini bottoms.

The female presenters could roll their eyes in an surrendering manner acknowledging the need of the good cause. The girls could write hello dad on their butt cheeks and the men in the audience could jeer with delight in accepting their entitlement to this charade. There could even be young children a la Richard and Judy, but then even the BBC has some morals. How we would laugh!

Got me thinking, surely that would be objectifying women?

LILLY ALLEN

2009-03-15T01:50:00.000-07:00

TWAT

Lilly Allen proves that sometimes to have one and to act like one goes hand in hand. Shame the photographer wasn't a woman because then she could have decked the vile bitch. This photographer is a gentleman, But he should have twatted her really!

When will modern day 'women' learn to act like grown ups not spoilt little violent bitches like Allen. Yes I think the press are shite but nobody should be violent. PARTICULARLY women. One day Allen will be twatted and then can act all victim like the Whinehouse creature.

UGLY WIMMIN

2009-03-07T00:17:00.000-08:00

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1157046/Model-left-student-scarred-life-glassing-attack-jailed-years.html

13 Year Old Dad or Abused Boy?

2009-02-14T03:35:00.000-08:00

I can't help but wince when I see the picture of the '13 year old dad'. It's not the fact that a 13 year old could get a girl pregnant or even the fact that they are having sex. Nature enables and elected public servants decide laws. No for me, it is the allegation that the girl is 15 and the boy 13. He looks more like 8 and she looks at least 16 17 and I don't mean stones. She looks like his mother. I cannot help but think that if the boy was 15, or heavens forbid 16, that the accusation would be rape and not a debate on under age sex. LOOK AT HIM! He looks prepubescent. What is wrong with her?

Having heard the child on TV in the UK, what is pretty safe to say, that he is one of the boys under achieving at every key stage of his education. I am concerned that nobody is going to question the girl,on the morality of this relationship. Having seen their mothers it looks like there is no chance of morals there. I think it is pretty safe to assume that this 'relationship' was initiated by the elder more mature person in the relationship. This time being a girl. Shock horror!.

I recall a mates girlfriend as young teenagers. At 15, she started seeing a lad of 17 and intentionally got pregnant to feed her desire to have a child. She openly admitted this and purely for selfish reasons. She got pregnant and the lad faded into obscurity. I think the whole world would have been shocked if she had baggeed herself a 13 year old banged him! Particulalry a 13 year old prepubescent who looks 8 at tops.

SKINS

2009-01-23T11:09:00.000-08:00

So SKINS returned to our screens on E4 Thursday 22.01.09. and it immediately went on to prove that the cast may have changed, the logo is different but the bad writing acting and usual exploitation of young actors (predominantly boys) was right there slapping you across the face.

It was pretty unbearable but to be honest I wanted to prove myself wrong about what to expect. Sadly wasn't meant to be. The saddest part (besides exploitation) was that it is so desperate for overseas sales that it was filmed to look American so it wouldn't look out of place. As everybody knows, the Bristol accent was really meant to be the southern states accent. But who cares.

The usual cliche ridden stories, pathetic boys up against knowledgeable controlled girls. The young brother spying on his sister in the shower (really) and the sister kicks the shit out of him. The over confident idiotic lad eager to expose his genitals in the gym scene. Utter shite and utterly surreal. Apart from all this, the most painful scene ever seen on TV was the appallingly acted gym sequence with some well known faces proving that the acting isn't the talent but the writing. Are you listening Bryan Elsey? Is the son who 'inspired' you really yours?

0/10

McTaggart

2009-01-21T10:47:00.000-08:00

SARAH SYMONDS

2009-01-11T02:46:00.000-08:00

Sarah Symonds - prostituted herself for money. She feels justified in sleeping with celebrities and revealing it to the world. Clearly Prostitute Symonds feels justified in this as she was single (banana - Deansgate) and therefore showed a distinct lack of regard for any morals at all. She CHOSE to sleep with the men in question and has the audacity to accuse them of being immoral and then has a rush of urgency to sell her story to the scum newspaper.

But from this is the proof that feminism is merely a cult (careful) that doesn't exceed beyond the sweaty cunted rug munchers who speak for themselves and their own agenda. They don't want the likes of prostitute Symonds in their cult. After all Symonds is the epitome of modern day women and not the 'victim' In fact there are very few wimmin that fall into the feminism category but Symonds proved she had not a fanny fart of a whiff of empathy towards sisterhood when she opened her legs and allowed a married men to fuck her. Fuck you Symonds.

White Boys Underachieving

2009-01-11T02:13:00.001-08:00

At last. An actual debate about the under achievement of white boys (BBC The Big Question 11.01.09) It was totally refreshing and whilst I object to some of the female dismissive notions of the lure of the street culture over good parenting, it was good to see a relatively mature discussion at least acknowledge the problem. It would be much better that the government got involved in having the muff to tackle these issues rather than pathetic examples of womanhood FIONA McTAGGERT having carte blanche to demonise innocent men.

Why the arse?

2009-01-05T02:48:00.000-08:00

Why have I put a naked female arse on the main mast? Good question. I despise exploitation of humans so much. However, I am sick to the back teeth of naked men in TV programmes. The pics on an earlier post give clear evidence to this exploitation. They were all found on a website totally dedicated to naked men in the media. I am big however, we did see one cheek of Steph's bottom in Hollyoaks last year. So its 99:1. Some way to go but hey, why not make it 0:0 and go for quality writing instead. It would appear that the immature British need to have cheeky saucy exploitative rudeness in every programme. As though somehow that is British life. But its equally rife in the US and in Oz too. Shamefull really but the male nudity is more shameful. I ask colleagues and friends to name a TV programme where there was female nudity. I usually have to name them for them. I don't pretend that it doesn't happen but the vast majority of the time, its men naked in front of clothed females. If sex scenes the woman will often be clothed (huh!) or covered by the naked male. Yet we hear the whines of certain women who feel that women are exposing their vaginas all the time. I cannot think of one example but to dismissively accuse the media of doing it is usually sufficient justification for some female producer to insist the young male actor gets his kit off for the sake of what? nothing other than to re-address a lie of a notion. Louise Page proudy professed to do just that when she produced a play at WY Playhouse. I mean really. Louise Page is a pervert. Sorry! Is that wrong? Would it only be a man deemed a pervert by trying to readdress a lie and myth? No. She was probaly cracking one off whilst the young man exposed his genitals in her shit production. Oh I forget, women don't do that! Riiiiiiight.

'But their are tits in the sun and star rags every day!' I hear some cry. Well yes, and all that proves is that there are sufficient women so desperate for the 15 minutes of fame that they exploit themselves for limited exposure and a modicum of noteriety. I don't know a man who buys the Sun for that reason. It appeals to the notion of masculinity that ensures certain men grunt and groan with delight and phwoar and say stuff like I would give that one for the sake of reinforcing the notion of red blooded heterosexually amongst his peer group. FHM do a readers girlfriends book and it is filled with equally fame hungry girls ready to get em out for the lads.

But the reality is its pretty dam rare you see a female arse anywhere. Not that I believe that the human being should be required to expose their arses at every opportunity. But fuck me am I sick of the modern trend to exploit young male actors in order to please some gay writer and the predominant gay audience of many TV progs. You cannot enjoy a programme without some young actor totally naked facing a woman, group of women or just dam naked. Even worse, when they writers are so unimaginative that they fill their banal programmes with sex but these days the trend is to have female clothed . Just like real life hey fellas? What's that all about then? Preventative measures me thinks. Apethetic men don't give a dam.

Examples posted earlier.

©masculistuk

Girls Under Pressure! GMTV

2008-12-15T00:13:00.000-08:00

A typical English Rose

Girls are under pressure. It's official! Let's invade another innocent country in view of this devastating finding! The poor dears are feeling stressed due to the fact they can't relax due to the regular testing at school and parents have high academic expectations at school. Seemingly, gone are the days when you can stay in and plait your hair with your mum or trough on chocolate watching charmed.

FFS why aren't women screaming at GMTV to stop being so patronising and sexist. Do they or the twats doing the research intentionally overlook boys? Is this Richard and Judy esque sexist drivel aimed to contribute to narrow minded sexist notions of women. Or is it a ploy to keep women in their place. But fear not ladies, the 'panel' have some suggestions:

Girls need support to be healthy and happy

The panel makes a number of recommendations about how girls can be supported to overcome the challenges of the 21st century:

Girls should be taught how to be resilient – at home and at school – to help them deal with problems as they arise.
Adults must accept their responsibilities as role models for young women – and should try to be inspiring.
Older children should be encouraged to act as mentors for younger ones.
Formal education should give a more rounded perspective on life; teaching young people how to deal with feelings and develop emotional resilience, and not just focus on academia. As one girl said: "PHSE is badly taught in my school. It doesn't teach girls what they want to know. Girls need to be educated for the world in which they live."

Their recommendations reinforce those obtained through in-depth research with Girlguiding UK's own members, which included: ensuring girls have things to do, creating safe places where girls can have freedom without their parents worrying and boost girls' confidence by providing them with opportunities to succeed outside school.

Thank heavens boys are just fine!

The shite was drivelled out on GMTV on 15 December 2008 by the smug vile Smith creature.

ITV FOOTBALL

2008-12-08T03:06:00.001-08:00

CLICKABLE PIC

What do you expect when you hang about men's changing rooms. This rot has to stop! What the fuck is so acceptable about loitering in men's changing rooms with cameras hooked up to a national broadcaster broadcasting live. Why do we never report from women's changing rooms and exploit and violate their privacy. Of course this was avoidable. DON'T GO THERE!

FIONA McTAGGART MISANDRIST

2008-11-29T03:30:00.000-08:00

It just pours out of her!

Rank old misandrist Fiona McTaggart is in favour of the demonisation and criminalisation of men who have sex with prostitutes. But she wants them charged with rape if the prostitute is part of the sex slave trade even though she admits that the men have no way of knowing this. Even if the prozzie says he/she is not part of it and indeed is then HE is the guilty party. (Buyer beware!)

Maybe McTaggart should look to criminalise prostitution. Come on McTaggart You profess to be in favour of women. Why not make prostitution illegal? Then you would be real big with your rug munching cronies and most decent people who don't want to have to drive past them on the way to work as they ply their vile trade on the borders of our cities.

What is clear when you see McTaggart, apart from an overwhelming desire to vomit, is that she really is unquestionably a misandrist and as such, should be kicked right out of the houses of parliament as it has no right to be there. Maybe Iraq of Afghanistan on the front lines would be a good place to get a better understanding. Afterall, it is supposed to serve the populous it represents not demonise a portion for personal reasons and her vile shit filled government took our men into their illegal war.

No doubt she will be proposing that the hauliers who deliver cigarettes to shops should be charged with causing lung cancer next. After all, it would be pretty safe to say that they are men driving the lorries and more wimmin smoke than men.

Get real McTaggart and get the muff out of parliament.

McTaggart spouted her vile bile on BBC Radio 4 Saturday 29.11.08 - This week in Transylvania.

Greer - Pervy Pensioner and Whinging Ozzy

2008-11-24T05:26:00.000-08:00

Cretin!

Pervy pensioner, former mattress back and biggotted hypocritical misandrist Greer is spouting its vile mouth on UK TV yet again. This time, it is whinging on about insects rights! Yes folks, INSECTS! Vile creature Greer, herself an insect from Oz has realised that people are now fully aware of the lies and myths and can no longer spite vile nasty vagina filled hatred towards men, she can no longer be a perverted whore and dribble over English teenage boys in the name of 'equality' whilst being a total twat filled hypocrite. No the old trout is whining on about I'm a Celebrity Get Me Out of Here! Talk about HYPOCRITE! Creature OAP Greer was in it herself. How about that? She is deemed a celebrity for being hate filled. Or is it that we could always see through her mental health issue and were just pissing ourselves at it!

I mean really, our Oz cousins call us POMES whinging but please. The whinges of a desperate pensioner from down under should only be heard from the Sydney Harbour Bridge and not on British TV.

Good Luck Mr Obama

2008-11-02T09:28:00.001-08:00

Good luck fella and thank you!

I have to pay homage to a great man. Barack Obama is the epitome of what being a man is all about. Yes people are being racist by viewing him as African American when in fact he is of mixed heritage. Yes he fought against Clinton and won! But the thing I admire most of all is that he is so obviously not in this because of his genitals (Hilary!!) and not in it because he is mixed race. To my knowledge, he has never mentioned his ethnicity nor his genitals throughout this. He represents and embraces all Americans and not just none European Americans or not just women. That's the difference ladies. And that is why you fail time and time again.

This false notion that everybody gives a shit about your vaginas. The misguided belief that you are somehow more important than men. The decades of lies, myths and misrepresentations does not open the door to the White House for you. Now is the time for YOU to change. To drop the self appointed notion of victimhood. To drop the notion that wheeling your vagina out and pointing at it every time you want something is the way forward. The great women leaders before never used their gender to win votes. Margaret Thatcher roared to power in the UK in 1979 and was in power for 11 years but it wasn't on the back of any false notion of entitlement. She worked her way though the ranks because of her ability and hard work. She won no fans with the vagina brigade because they are not for equality. They want their own agenda and will never EVER gain anything at all.

Importantly, remember despite Clinton's faux pas she did not engage with just women. Many women did not engage with her at all, many men did. The good thing was she engaged with men and women black white brown or yellow. However, her big mistake, indeed it would be anybody's mistake, was the false notion that there was any entitlement to position. Nothing is given in life. Except the upper chamber which indeed should be abolished. Never ever forgot the multi millions upon millions of men who have built this world by having their lives raped from their very being. The men who created nations, who gave their lives, who created laws, who pioneered and who are INDEED the very foundation of existence on this planet. They are not going to hand this over and go ' fair cop' Fair cop? Why should they. Women are not in a position where the state can decide to end your life by calling you to fight for your country. Don't be so lazy in thinking it could never happen. In fact this inequality (funnily women are not screaming about this one) millions of men in the US are eligible for this even today. This is a fact!

In the UK, we are already seeing the start of the debate about the notion of a Black Prime Minister. Please see all of the above for any chance. Because once again, your skin colour does not entitle you to anything. Your passion and drive will help you succeed. Drop any notion of entitlement because you exist. Work your way though the ranks. It is possible. There is a vastly over representation of Jewish people in the UK Government. Challenge it, but remember how they got there. It wasn't through some discriminatory project to address an imbalance. Go into it without any personal agenda and you could succeed.

Debate and rhetoric apart, good luck Mr Obama for me you are the man for the job. But it is for the American people to decide. All people, never forget that Prime ministers and Presidents are just puppets on a string.

©MASCULISTUK

Vest Top Brigade

2008-11-02T01:32:00.000-07:00

Click pic for larger view

I don't normally wear vest tops. I don't have the figure to carry them off. Well I am a man after all. They are for ladies really aren't they? I mean they pass off as acceptable workplace attire in many organisations whilst men have to wear shirt and ties. But, if I want to join an Indian Head massage course at the Leeds Swarthmore Centre, one is indeed required to wear a vest top when calling them about the course. Really! What a liberty! I was going to wear my jockstrap and a Nirvana T'shirt. I need to get a vest top. Asda Radcliffe is open late. I could grab one on my way home and call them tomorrow. Yeah! Sorted!

Wait a minute. Hang on there. I smell something fishy! No, they wouldn't would they? No it says all are welcome. Anyway people realised the sex discrimination act protects men as well. No! Surely the pre-requisite to actually wear a vest top is a veil. Oh noooo not a veil to prevent men from joining the course surely not. I mean they don't do head massage in the buff do they? I mean women are no longer allowed to discriminate or alienate men anymore. So surely the lot at Swarthmore in their lefty loneliness would ever consider alternative methods of sexually discriminating against men? I mean where there is under representation of women in any walk of life, it is practically compulsory to talk as though every other person is a woman.

Sadly, this is clearly aimed at women only and whilst I have yet to challenge them, I feel that they will use some tool or other to ensure this man is not in the room. How else can they groom their sense of victimhood into their attendees if in fact they could be challenged!

©Masculistuk

BEN FREEMAN - INNOCENT MAN

2008-10-20T02:21:00.000-07:00

VICTIM

Ben Freeman had a successful career appearing in English TV soap Emmerdale. Whilst holidaying abroad a lolita accused him of rape. His career collapsed and he had to live for 2 years with the stigma of being a rapist until he was proven innocent. Meanwhile, the slag who accussed him of this gets off scott free and without a single bit of press coverage. She should be named and shamed. For me, the worst violation a man or woman can experience is rape. The next must be the accusation. For a man, he has to be proven innocent not proven guilty.

Best wishes to Ben Freeman. Deepest sympathy for the slag and her family whose anonymity does not provide a veil for the deep shame that she should feel. For her act was as violating as what she professed. It's only time before the rules will change. Then women may think twice.

©MASCULISTUK

Kelly Mac

2008-09-28T10:32:00.001-07:00

DAVID WALLIAMS

2008-09-22T02:06:00.000-07:00

David Walliams was taking the Little Britain show around Australia when he received a complaint from a lad in the audience. The show on the BBC was a behind the scenes look at the tour. What our Ozzy cousins have done to deserve them two I don't know.

Walliams was contemptuous as you would expect. But the point was this. Walliams, was playing the part of the whicky woo character, I forget his name but the failed TV presenter. Walliams thought it would be hilarious to get young male teenagers out of the audience and try to remove their trousers and expose their butts (along with the rest). But as soon as the lads resist it becomes a battle. Apparently word spread around Oz and lads were purposefully wearing tight belts. One unaware lad was dragged from the audience and put through this shameful sexual violation by the perverted Walliams whose contemptuous response to his heartfelt letter of complaint was that there are no subjects you can't make fun out of. I tend to agree with that Walliams. But then that does not give you the right to humiliate and violate men in order to attempt to raise a laugh. When people laugh at such matters it is through nervousness and an uncertainty of how to behave in such circumstances. Because this is not an everyday occurrence, and the fact that it would be deemed an unmanly response, men accept it and treat it as a joke.

Quite simply, like the visa man as discussed previously and all the other such similar issues I raise, think about it! If it were a woman being violated like that, then Walliams would have made his contemptuous retort as he was being carted of to the clink! There is no reason that exists that excuses this complete double standard. Like so many of my beliefs, this is once again linked into the apathetic man. But in this instance there was indeed a response from a very brave young man. Oh and Walliams does get a a little back because he got hurt in the fracas. What a cunt!

The clip is here

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o1NFKzWT_X0

©MASCULISTUK

Russell T Davies - Gay writer.

2008-09-20T01:23:00.000-07:00

Yes it does look big in it!

I recall the pathetic whining of gay writer Russel T Davies during an interview for the Dr Who confidential programme on the BBC. You see gay writer RTD was hoping to have had a naked shot of fellow gay John Barrowman's arse in the programme. You see, Gay writer RTD is 'sick of seeing women's bottoms on TV' and thought it was time to reverse the trend!!! The sensible BBC declined due probably to a modicum of standards and the retention of some of the Dr Who tradition values such as not being a gay porn programme. Well obviously RTD's subscription to the Beefy Men channel got mixed up with the Big and Bouncy channel, because, dear Russell, if it were even in you to actually want to see a woman's arse, you would be extremely hard pressed to find one dear chap. Please adjust your pink blinkers and put your brain back in your head and wake up to a degree of reality dear gay writer that you are. Find that remote control and try BBC 1,2 or 3 Try ITV 1 or 2 Try channel 4 E4 if you want porn. Then there is Five Living Diva and a zillion other channels where you will find naked men inter woven for your pleasure. Your fellow gay writers are the ones writing the drivel. Your fellow gay writers are living their sad little rank wank fantasies and passing it off as entertainment. Mt dear Russell there are websites dedicated to it? But don't worry yourself gay writer RTD, the women will be pretty much covered up so you won't need a sick bucket! But if there is any, you can guarantee that you will receive sufficient warning!

Oh no! Can you believe that football is on TV tonight. I'm sorry Russell you may want to watch it for the plethora of womens bums that will no doubt be thrusting across the screens. or why not watch the repeat of 'Being Human' where Russell Tovey gets fully naked. You know the programme, the one by that gay writer ...... Toby Whitehouse that's the fellow. Now tell me Russell, why did you fancy Russell Tovey as the next Dr Who?

Below are just some of the examples I found. Yes I cannot spell unknown!

©MASCULISTUK

"Rape"

2008-09-19T23:46:00.000-07:00

Is this a tranny?

Since when does a so called "rape victim" pack a condom in her bag when going to meet her "violator"?

After a recent trip to Yorkshire, I picked up the local rag the Yorkshire Evening Post. On the second page was a picture of a young man who had been accused of raping a 12 year old girl. But before you look to your sweet innocent 12 year old nephew or niece and see them as a potential victim, this girl duped the man into believing she was 19. They met on the internet. The judge HERSELF said

Sentencing XXXXX to a 12-month conditional discharge at Leeds Crown Court, Judge Kershaw said: "I accept the defendant did not know how old this girl was. I accept he did not know she was under the age of 16, still less did he know she was in fact 12."

she went on:

"It seems to me that this defendant was deceived. He was deceived in a number of material respects both beforehand and during their encounter."

She added:

Judge Jennifer Kershaw QC said she had seen images of the girl in school uniform giving video evidence to police and an image of how she had presented herself on the website. She said: "The contrast between her appearance on those two very different occasions is striking."

What is clear is that this man is not a rapist. I am sick to death of the demonisation of men whilst the whore of a girl gets away as a victim. This girl certainly new what she was doing, she lied to her parents and the victim himself and even packed a condom. She lied to her parents in order to be able to stay the night with him. I question why a 12 year old girl would be so sexually advanced, so manipulative so desperate for sex that she had no choice but to go beyond her age into the realms of legality. Because most of her male peers will be running round the playground re-enacting scenes from their favourite TV shows. This lolita chose her victim to satisfy her sexual appetite and even convinced the judge that the victim would not have been able to tell the girl was under age. Yet the poor victim has his photograph and street named in the oily rag.

A psychiatrists report stated:

A psychiatrist's report on xxxx concluded he had no sexual interest in children and is not a paedophile. xxxxx name will be on the Sex Offenders' Register for 12 months and he was made the subject of a 12-month Sexual Offences Prevention Order banning him from contacting the girl.

Tink Palmer (what the fuck?) who is Director of Stop it Now said:

"This man should have thought this is wrong, this child is at risk. The court was told this man was duped but I think this man has duped the law, he has duped the court."

Misandrist is so obviously written right through 'Tinks' saggy hairy body. Clearly the man was the victim and clearly there is an issue with the parents and indeed the law for being such an ass that the real victim's name and street and photograph were printed whilst lolita can continue through school and be brainwashed into the notion of victim hood. The real crime here is the inability to see who the victim was. Lolita was not raped, period!

SHAMEFULL!!!!!

©MASCULISTUK

REFLEXOLOGY FOR VAGINAS

2008-09-08T11:35:00.000-07:00

Happening upon this pic on google, I was reminded of the time I applied for a course to study reflexology. I contacted the college to ascertain the enrolling evening etc and was firmly advised that the course was for wimmin only! When I had finished laughing, Bob ( I think that was her name) proffered the reason was due to the lack of male changing facilities and some of her ladies would be uncomfortable with this. I scanned the college document to check it was reflexology I had called and not a wimmin embracing their vagina class. Nope, clear as day, REFLEXOLOGY and no notice of it being wimmin only. Therefore my assumption is that the ladies want it to be girls only. Nothing wrong with that. It's just a shame that people who spout their vile bile about the lack of equality only see vaginas as worthy recipient of equality.

Think back to the countless number of times some woman or other has celebrated her breaking into a male only bastion as though she was being denied something fundamentally her right. Think about young Stacy-Marie who was overjoyed to be able to play football with boys but would never be totally happy until she got the cock and balls to go with it. You see I find it very strange that a woman would want to do some of these things and this opens up an entire new debate about sexuality. But then remember little Kyle down the road who dressed up as a girl and preferred the boys, this did not empower him to become a nun, or join the girl guides or a women only fitness centre or anywhere where a penis is not allowed irrespective of just how much he wanted the right with every fibre of his being.

Think about the way men were portrayed when questioned as to why women can't join a men only organisation. TV reporters will often ask what do the men fear what do they have to hide? This goes hand in hand with the notion that men should not be offered any privacy (see my other posts) You see ladies, I will admit that men do have one flaw. The ability to communicate with one another beyond the realms of the seemingly acceptable norms that society wishes to portray. Yet in their own environs, they can actually survive without your intervention and indeed can even find a friend that he may want to spend time with and even communicate with and sometimes but only sometimes because you know he is completely void without you, but sometimes never the less, do like minded things with. Sometimes, this could even stretch to wanting to take an interesting evening class without thinking about, sniffing, peaking or heaven forbid looking at your vagina.

©MASCULISTUK

Ofcom on Richard and Judy Low

2008-09-07T03:44:00.000-07:00

I was so incensed with the double standards on UK TV, that I wrote to Ofcom about this programme. You see I really feel that the guys were violated and pushed into a situation that comments regarding masculinity would ensue if one of them refused. They could all say that they were perfectly happy to do it and that is fine, but that is not the point. The point is that there is a clear double standard with regard nudity on UK TV. The lack of female nudity is a clear double standard and boils down to apathetic men, brainwashed by lies and myths associated with nudity and for the actors perceptions of masculinity to refuse such parts on TV. With the plethora of gay writers it is a sad inevitable fact as they are not talented enough to write anything else.

Seemingly, Ofcom inform me, that it is not breaking any code to show nudity through the day, So why have we never had the naked news, or Loose Women in the buff? How come Fern and Philip don't expose their genitals? How come kids TV isn't full of nudity as oppossed to the occassional boy who for one reason or another has been duped into his nakedness and is seen clutching his privates in front of a group of laughing children.

As I said before, I do not have a copy of the programme but I wish I had indeed kept it as my memory seems to bring a child in the audience and I did see one of the men's genitals. This is an absolute abomination and shows just how shameful Ofcom is as well as Channel 4. This is a complete invasion of the men's privacy. The most private part of any human is their genitals and it belittles men to have their private parts as public fodder for a bit of fun whilst female genitalia would be tantamount to rape!

Ofcom is a complete shambles and I seriously question it's existence when it is more likey to fine an advert for not being pc over this exploitative porn. But then it's all about keeping women in there place. Think about it!!!

On a brighter note, Richard and Judy are now on their way to TV heaven aka UKTV Gold which speaks mountains.

©MASCULISTUK

Richard & Judy Hit a New Low.

2008-08-27T09:54:00.000-07:00

Imagine, if you will, you are an overweight woman. Lacking confidence but determined to loose weight. You see the weight loss guru on Richard and Judy and you decide to apply to be on the show. So there you are, you've done it. Fully aware that your curvy bits will be public property. Fully accepting of the fact that you may have to strip down to your undies in order to get weighed in front of the predominant women and children who make up the market share for this time slots audience, you post the application off.

Luckily, you are selected and end up wobbling across the screens feeling all liberated with your equally overweight yet determined fat fighters. Week after week, your progress is monitored closely by the nation and a grateful Richard and Judy. As the season draws to a close, you are asked to expose your vagina to an audience of cheering men! Would you? Is it moral? Of course not! Such filth would only ever be imposed on men and the audience cheering on would be predominantly women. I think I saw the odd man and would not swear to it but thought I saw a child. I wonder how on earth they managed to persuade these guys to expose their genitals to this seemingly over excited audience. I don't care if they were all 20 stones or 12 stone Greek gods. The very fact that this was imposed upon them as men was a vile degrading act by the UK's pornography Channel C4. I can imagine the pressure they were under. But I would have been so pleased if they had told C4 to fuck off! But then, as I have said before, this kind of violation is acceptable to men. There is this notion that he doesn't need any privacy. That's pretty obvious. I did see a glimpse of one gentleman's private parts and yes I was disgusted. I appreciate it was live but its just another example of double standards and barriers constantly being pushed. I don't want to see this kind of thing at any time of day but pre-watershed? Come off it Channel 4. Scrape yourself out of the gutter and grow up! And men, are you so stupid?

©MASCULISTUK

IRIS ROBINSON - FEMALE CHAUVANISTIC SOW

2008-08-02T00:13:00.001-07:00

Iris Robinson compares homosexuality with child abuse. This old sow bashes her bible and talks about loving homosexuals because her 2000 year old compendium tells her to. It permits her to condem an entire 'god' given group of people because some king or other had it added to the bible. Yes this chauvanist offends a greater proportion of the population than all ethinic groups put together and a proportion of the population that the churches would sell its soul to the devil to have a fraction of its bums on its splintery old seats. I wonder, where the Robinson is when all the child abuse by the church are brought to light?

I often condem the behaviors of homosexuals, I do not at all see the point of them portraying homosexuality as nothing but sex and nudity and they think that they just have to flaunt it in everybodys face. But then if it helps with the hate agenda so they make a rod for their own backs. But then Robinson talks about it with such venom but needs to look at the child abusing church and comment on that. It is a widely known fact that many homophobes are latent homosexuals themselves. So maybe Robinson fancies a bit and is condeming that side of her vile personality.

Shame on you Robinson for being a biggoted hate filled chauvinistic old sow! Your religion not much help to you there.

©MASCULISTUK

CORONATION STREET IS DYING

2008-07-20T07:43:00.001-07:00

'You looking for a fat lip an all!'

'Smash his fat face in!'

Damon Rochefort insults majority women by writing for Coronation Street on Weds 16 July 2007. He's not alone. It seems that many writers (presumably gay) and some women writers seem to find the threat of domestic violence is a riot, but only if the intended recipient is male. Think about it.Is this really entertainment? I know many UK women are a shame upon the human race, but that really is a small proportion of UK society. For the writers to allow the vile Michelle to punch Steve and draw blood and treat it like he deserved it was an insult to every single victim of violence the length and breadth of the land. Despite the fact that men are the biggest victims of all crimes in UK society, the 'writers' seem content to portray this violence as an acceptable norm that needs no retaliation. Remember how Granada dealt with the Jim/ Liz story where he slapped her for being a two timing tart? Quite honestly, if a woman punched me like Michelle did, she would be without question or guilt punched back. Until people stop brainwashing their boys not to hit girls then this segment of a violent society would without question subside!