January 05, 2009

Why the arse?



Why have I put a naked female arse on the main mast?  Good question. I despise exploitation of humans so much. However, I am sick to the back teeth of naked men in TV programmes. The pics on an earlier post give clear evidence to this exploitation. They were all found on a  website totally dedicated to naked men in the media. I am big however, we did see one cheek of Steph's bottom in Hollyoaks last year. So its 99:1. Some way to go but hey, why not make it 0:0 and go for quality writing instead. It would appear that the immature British need to have cheeky saucy exploitative rudeness in every programme. As though somehow that is British life. But its equally rife in the US and in Oz too. Shamefull really but the male nudity is more shameful.  I ask colleagues and friends to name a TV programme where there was female nudity. I usually have to name them for them. I don't pretend that it doesn't happen but the vast majority of the time, its men naked in front of clothed females. If sex scenes the woman will often be clothed (huh!) or covered by the naked male. Yet we hear the whines of certain women who feel that women are exposing their vaginas all the time. I cannot think of one example but to dismissively accuse the media of doing it is usually sufficient justification for some female producer to insist the young male actor gets his kit off for the sake of what? nothing other than to re-address a lie of a notion. Louise Page proudy professed to do just that when she produced a play at WY Playhouse. I mean really. Louise Page is a pervert. Sorry! Is that wrong? Would it only be a man deemed a pervert by trying to readdress a lie and myth? No. She was probaly cracking one off whilst the young man exposed his genitals in her shit production. Oh I forget, women don't do that! Riiiiiiight. 

'But their are tits in the sun and star rags every day!' I hear some cry. Well yes, and all that proves is that there are sufficient women so desperate for the 15 minutes of fame that they exploit themselves for limited exposure and a modicum of noteriety. I don't know a man who buys the Sun for that reason. It appeals to the notion of masculinity that ensures certain men grunt and groan with delight and phwoar and say stuff like I would give that one for the sake of reinforcing the notion of red blooded heterosexually amongst his peer group.  FHM do a readers girlfriends book and it is filled with equally fame hungry girls ready to get em out for the lads. 

But the reality is its pretty dam rare you see a female arse anywhere. Not that I believe that the human being should be required to expose their arses at every opportunity. But fuck me am I sick of the modern trend to exploit young male actors in order to please some gay writer and the predominant gay audience of many TV progs.  You cannot enjoy a programme without some young actor totally naked facing a woman, group of women or just dam naked. Even worse, when they writers are so unimaginative that they fill their banal programmes with sex but these days the trend is to have female clothed . Just like real life hey fellas? What's that all about then? Preventative measures me thinks. Apethetic men don't give a dam.

Examples posted earlier.

©masculistuk