I am totally opposed to all levels of circumcision. Always have been and always will be. I think it is child abuse to circumcise a boy carried out by deluded paedophiles. I do not apologise for my view. never have done and never will do. To cut the flesh of a new born baby boy is heralded as a passage of rites for some poor victims. Even you English introduced it to the USA in order to prevent boys doing what nature insists they do.
Yet here we see the proposal to criminalise those who do this on girls. Why just girls? Surely the level of violation committed on baby boys is comparable to more abhorrent than rape and its pedo practitioners rapists. Yet apathy raises its misandrystic head when ever anybody dares to criticise this practise. There are those misandrysts who feel that it should be carried out to protect women for fucks sake. Yet clearly the vagina harbours as many if not more germs than the penis. But we just don't touch on that do we. We never address that as it puts women in some kind of lower ranking to suggest that such a thing were possible. Some vaginas are like a road traffic accident and I have yet to hear a discussion at work about the smell coming from a man's penis when he is at the loo. Yet there are several women at work who have gained notoriety for the smelly slots to the utter disgust of the majority. So maybe there IS an argument for circumcision? Or maybe just the acceptance that god made us in this way for a reason and water is intended to give life and cleanse.
©MUK / Metro.
