Just a response to more misandry from the Gaurdian. Surprisingly Misogyny was the opening word, shocker!
04/08/2013
18:17
Misandry, unlike misogyny, would never be the first word on an article about Misandry. Indeed, despite the frequency and acceptability of misandry, it is a word that rarely enters into everyday language, especially amongst the misandryious media that exists within the UK. Indeed, misandry is promoted by columnists of this newspaper and given kudos by the rantings of those misandrysts who are given column space to articles such as Bindell's 'Why I hate men"
There is a romantic notion attached to women that just doesn't sit well in an enlightened era where we hear more and more of the women who commit domestic violence, sexually violate men and children, who steal, commit all manner of crimes, who drink and drive, who abuse children so much that the NSPCC had to hide the fact on its website that more women abused children than men. But I pity those who stand up to this, as the Director of Kidscape had to endure some horrendous abuse when she highlighted the problem of female padeos. Indeed, Greer proffered the notion of the acceptabilty of female paedophillia by suggesting that the boy is asking for it if he becomes aroused. Thankfully, even the UK government has outlawed this kind of thought process.
Unsurprisingly, the Guardian reported on the baby boy who was flushed down the toilet as an accidental birth, despite the lack of umbilical cord and after birth. The Guardian just could not believe a women could do it. We exist in a world where the demonisation of men is acceptable in all arenas. Violence towards male has become so endemic within or culture that is is treated as a humourous by product of life, something to laugh at.
The person who referred to Robin Thickes video ...... and? Your point is? We endure the sexualisation of men daily, in popular TV like soaps, dramas documentaries and comedies. Nude shoots for girly magazines are never discussed. Topless men naked men are unsurpassed by the notion of female exploitation and ignored as a by product of the myths of female objectification. Indeed, we have become so desensitised to the male nude, and ignore it as a cheeky and un-invasive due to pre-conceived notions of acceptabilty, boundaries and an assumption that he is comfortable being objectified. I had to overcome this only last week as the topless bartender at Revolution had to endure screams of delight and had to be groped by his female audience
Back to the point, women demand so much air space it is at epedemic levels. Indeed so much so that the utterance of women in practically every sentence in popular media has become the norm. And of course when you point out some little facts that favour women it is accepted with greedy open arms without any question to the source, Prove facts that favour men and the source is questionable and myth is generated to justify the female perspective being somehow more important. On a daily basis, men are threatened on Twitter, Facebook et al. No outrage there. indeed no airspace proffered to this acceptable bi-product of using anonymous social media to express yourself.
Genital mutilation of boys is ignored and when the BBC dares to discuss it, they turn it into a womens’ issue and dwell on the mothers guilt and not the experience of the baby boy, completely overlooking this vile practice and seek un-found and disproved medical benefits as a justification. Misandry! (Men’s Hour), yet so much time is afforded to female genital mutilation equally a babrbaric ritual that stems the age of time, but the middle class western women adopt this with so much vigour one would imagine they were the victim of it themselves.
We still to this day hear talk of women and the vote. Despite a centuary of this rhetoric, does a women ever quote the fact that the million men who died in the 1418 war did not have the vote? Of course not. Feminism is a lottery win that the greedy recipients will not share. Because if you share inequality you loose some of the credability of your objections and thus deny yourself the sole victim which you so love to wallow in.
