Walliams was contemptuous as you would expect. But the point was this. Walliams, was playing the part of the whicky woo character, I forget his name but the failed TV presenter. Walliams thought it would be hilarious to get young male teenagers out of the audience and try to remove their trousers and expose their butts (along with the rest). But as soon as the lads resist it becomes a battle. Apparently word spread around Oz and lads were purposefully wearing tight belts. One unaware lad was dragged from the audience and put through this shameful sexual violation by the perverted Walliams whose contemptuous response to his heartfelt letter of complaint was that there are no subjects you can't make fun out of. I tend to agree with that Walliams. But then that does not give you the right to humiliate and violate men in order to attempt to raise a laugh. When people laugh at such matters it is through nervousness and an uncertainty of how to behave in such circumstances. Because this is not an everyday occurrence, and the fact that it would be deemed an unmanly response, men accept it and treat it as a joke.
Quite simply, like the visa man as discussed previously and all the other such similar issues I raise, think about it! If it were a woman being violated like that, then Walliams would have made his contemptuous retort as he was being carted of to the clink! There is no reason that exists that excuses this complete double standard. Like so many of my beliefs, this is once again linked into the apathetic man. But in this instance there was indeed a response from a very brave young man. Oh and Walliams does get a a little back because he got hurt in the fracas. What a cunt!
The clip is here
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o1NFKzWT_X0
©MASCULISTUK
