Is this a tranny?
After a recent trip to Yorkshire, I picked up the local rag the Yorkshire Evening Post. On the second page was a picture of a young man who had been accused of raping a 12 year old girl. But before you look to your sweet innocent 12 year old nephew or niece and see them as a potential victim, this girl duped the man into believing she was 19. They met on the internet. The judge HERSELF said
Sentencing XXXXX to a 12-month conditional discharge at Leeds Crown Court, Judge Kershaw said: "I accept the defendant did not know how old this girl was. I accept he did not know she was under the age of 16, still less did he know she was in fact 12."
she went on:
"It seems to me that this defendant was deceived. He was deceived in a number of material respects both beforehand and during their encounter."
She added:
Judge Jennifer Kershaw QC said she had seen images of the girl in school uniform giving video evidence to police and an image of how she had presented herself on the website. She said: "The contrast between her appearance on those two very different occasions is striking."
What is clear is that this man is not a rapist. I am sick to death of the demonisation of men whilst the whore of a girl gets away as a victim. This girl certainly new what she was doing, she lied to her parents and the victim himself and even packed a condom. She lied to her parents in order to be able to stay the night with him. I question why a 12 year old girl would be so sexually advanced, so manipulative so desperate for sex that she had no choice but to go beyond her age into the realms of legality. Because most of her male peers will be running round the playground re-enacting scenes from their favourite TV shows. This lolita chose her victim to satisfy her sexual appetite and even convinced the judge that the victim would not have been able to tell the girl was under age. Yet the poor victim has his photograph and street named in the oily rag.
A psychiatrists report stated:
A psychiatrist's report on xxxx concluded he had no sexual interest in children and is not a paedophile. xxxxx name will be on the Sex Offenders' Register for 12 months and he was made the subject of a 12-month Sexual Offences Prevention Order banning him from contacting the girl.
Tink Palmer (what the fuck?) who is Director of Stop it Now said:
"This man should have thought this is wrong, this child is at risk. The court was told this man was duped but I think this man has duped the law, he has duped the court."
Misandrist is so obviously written right through 'Tinks' saggy hairy body. Clearly the man was the victim and clearly there is an issue with the parents and indeed the law for being such an ass that the real victim's name and street and photograph were printed whilst lolita can continue through school and be brainwashed into the notion of victim hood. The real crime here is the inability to see who the victim was. Lolita was not raped, period!
SHAMEFULL!!!!!
©MASCULISTUK
