click
Here we go again. I just arrived home from work and turned on the BBC News. There we are unravelling the latest accusations of child abuse this time the accused is 'artist' Graham Ovenden. This got me thinking and a literal 60 seconds search on the internet I was able to locate a collection of paintings of young boys naked in various positions. Many artists were involved in this crime including women. The black box represents the modesty and privacy they deserve and my opinion of those people who objectify others.
Now then, so we are now to point the finger of suspicion at the 'artist' who takes it upon his or herself and get naked children to pose for them. Oh yes indeed, 60 seconds found that at least one of these pictures is by Myra Goldick. Now this raises a lifelong question in me. Why oh why have people not seen before now, that getting people to pose naked is nothing other than a veil for their own perversion. Yes, the women too. Sorry! But if you think about it, a lot of pretentious twats speak a lot of verbal bollocks and justify their mad perversions.
Michael Winterbottom justified his pornographic 'film' by saying he was challenging boundaries and perceptions of acceptability. He said if he could read about people having sex in a book then he could film real sex. Yes Winterbottom, its called pornography! Using Winterbottoms' vile justifications we can expect to see real murders, real rapes, real shootings, real torture all for real in the cinema.
Tracy Emin's My Bed which was literally an abortion yet it was applauded as reference was made to her state of mind at the time and its representation in the stained sheets on the bed. Emin also employed to Chinese men to jump up and down naked on it. And sheep people actually applauded it. However it was also seen as an objection to the arrival of the Chinese president. Okaaaaaaay!
Indeed, my very own piece of art which I displayed in Leeds Art Gallery was a huge success. I took a massive crap and I placed it in several piles of differing sizes in a white walled room. Now before the police could be called I expressed that it was a visual representation of my anger at Labour's war on Islam. I said the massive turd represented the torment and turmoil of the innocent Muslim people. The two smaller turds represented Tony Blair and George Bush. I then burst into tears and tore at my clothes, ran around the room a few times shaking a tambourine and hit myself on the head with the bible. I then employed a woman to smear tea spoon fulls of the shite over her naked body and suggested that it represented the guilt of the British people. The police quickly moved in and said I would be arrested unless the naked model was male otherwise it would be sexist and objectification. I reluctantly agreed and contacted Roger Hiorns to see if he was finished with the naked man looking at the fire on the park bench. Hiorns said he had and that he never wanted to see the lousy heterosexual slut again. So indeed I did manage to get a naked model and all was well in the world.
Now back to the point, what the fucking hell is wrong with the world. A childs nakedness is not something for the chattering classes to seek at every opportunity and to be deployed as some kind of trophy in museums or on the walls in the homes of pretentious middle class twats. Irrespective of what old cunts like Greer says about such matters. I feel that Ovendon and his ilk are guilty of a serious mental health issue and should be treated (and punished for his alleged crimes if found guilty)
I do so hate the smugness that smears across these peoples faces when they admire such work and comment on it in such a way. And, I have to say, especially when the subject is a naked man. Note how smug women act in front of a naked male. All sly and deviously hiding their lust. Acting as though it were acceptable as if somehow they 'own' his nakedness. As though they were owed something. Remember how (Joan) Bakewell stared at the naked young man on the BBC, as though she was somehow entitled to see what was live pornography. Or how Nina Miskow smugly declared the model in the first UK female porn magazine should have been erect. (Much respect goes to Miskow though, she speaks the truth about women)
Remember young Billy Elliot had to describe his dance in such a way to appeal to the pretentious bastards who had just put a kid through such turmoil because of his dancing. How he was seemingly unfit for the Royal Ballet until he expressed himself in such a way that fitted in with the requirements of those wishing to attend. Thus it was this that secured his place at the ballet school not the dancing.
Remember young Billy Elliot had to describe his dance in such a way to appeal to the pretentious bastards who had just put a kid through such turmoil because of his dancing. How he was seemingly unfit for the Royal Ballet until he expressed himself in such a way that fitted in with the requirements of those wishing to attend. Thus it was this that secured his place at the ballet school not the dancing.
I think the time has come to say enough is enough. The vile sleaze that passes as entertainment in the UK is not worth a waft of Greer's cunt. Yet it is applauded at every opportunity. Just like Ovendon's work was once upon a time.
I really hope that all the happenings we have seen over the last few years about child abuse etc is really the start of a new era whereby people are respected for what they do and not what they represent. Then the likes of crazy fuck Emin could be detained in some kind of institution and not applauded for being a dirty bitch.
Good day to you.
Good day to you.