WPC KELLY JONES

PLOD

The claim culture does not evade the police. 




http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-norfolk-24066843

FORMER X FACTOR ENTRANT JAILED FOR SERIOUS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

CUNT

VICTIM

I hope she has a broken bottle thrust into her cunt! 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2252882/Why-X-Factors-boyfriend-beater-Lucie-Slater-spending-Christmas-cell-says-writer-Peter-Lloyd.html

PETER LLOYD ON LEVELL CASE

Link to Peter's view on the LeVell case. 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2417412/Michael-Le-Vell-WHEN-men-pre-conviction-anonymity-rape-trials.html

MICHAEL LEVELL - INNOCENT

Michael Turner (LeVell) is innocent. Did we all know it or did we start to suspect that he could indeed have committed the abhorrent acts his accuser (LIAR!) claimed? I know there where times even I wondered if it was possible. You begin to question things like does stardom begin to make you feel invincible and all powerful.

But in this instance, he was cleared of ALL lies aimed at him and left court a free man. Of course, this will remain with him for the rest of his life. Meanwhile, the lying cunt who made the accusations will remain anonymous and enjoy the freedom of going through her sad life knowing she almost ruined a mans life by her lies. 

Following the decision, some high profile and well known celebrity faces were demanding its time for the accused to remain anonymous until any such time that he (or she as discussed on Channel 5 The Wright Stuff)  is found to be guilty. Many seem uncomfortable on this issue and I wonder why. With women now going to prison for false rape allegations, the precious ones will demand anonymity so that they too can be unidentified and will find all manner of excuses for this. 


http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/the-michael-le-vell-verdict-is-in-but-all-the-lessons-are-still-to-learn-8809461.html

LEANNE BLACK - FALSE RAPE ACCUSER.

LEANNE BLACK - FALSE RAPE ACCUSER. 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2358759/Leanne-Black-finally-jailed-FIVE-false-rape-allegations-ex-boyfriends-years.html

CATHY RICHARDSON - FALSE RAPE ACCUSER.

CATHY RICHARDSON - FALSE RAPE ACCUSER.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-23629148


ANGELA ENGLAND - FALSE RAPE ACCUSER.

ANGELA ENGLAND - FALSE RAPE ACCUSER.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-23645807

ELIZABETH JONES - FALSE RAPE ACCUSER.

ELIZABETH JONES - FALSE RAPE ACCUSER.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/9894588/Compulsive-liar-jailed-after-11-false-rape-claims-in-decade.html

shall I go on?

Who ate all the pies?

Troll Alert

OK so I'm happily tweeting and this mong from Lardsville County USA asked her followers to view my 'avatar' before blocking me. Well, listen here Ms Lard Arse. Without the achievement of men, your enormous oversized gut bucket arse would not be able to exist. Practically EVERY medical & scientific discovery, labour saving device, indeed everything YOU take for granted came from man. Even your fat old arse of a life started life in a man. So rather than eating all the pies in the county, taking pictures of your pathetic dog and the equally vile selfies, why not grow a clit and quit bitching about men. Because fatty, if you refused to have anything at all in your life that came from man, you would live in an enormous great hole (kindly created my a machine invented by men) flicking your vagina. 

Myra Hindley - Cunt!

Cunt

I watched the recent series on Hindley on Channel 5. Really interesting how it challenged the stereotypical notions of female criminals. 

Hindley was often portrayed as a victim but was a very violent woman thanks to her mother who was violent and initiated domestic violence.  Hindley was a woman who was taught to be violent against boys by her father. 

Hindley was a coward who tried to blame her violence on her father rather than take the blame for her own actions.  She would invariably initiate violence against males.  No lessens or boundaries regarding gender were discussed. She chose the first victim of her and Bradys' sick and twisted vile crimes.  Gender is replaced by evil when discussing female crimes as though somehow only evil could be the cause of this. Of course we all know, women are capable of anything and not just the good. 

Guess which the Guardian deems to be sexist objectification?

CLICK

Guess yet?  Of course, it was the one with the woman in the dress.

Back in January this year, I was flicking through the TV channels and happened upon SKY news paper review. One of the reviewers was a (or THE) fashion reporter for the Guardian. 
 She was doing what Guardian women do best, moan whinge and whine. On this occasion it was about this image used by M&S and she described it as the usual 'sexist objectification.' I mean I could not contain myself. 

It seems that many women are so seriously mentally ill that they are utterly unable to equate sexism or objectification with anything other than women.

The pictures above are all published images including the male full frontal uncensored genitals image used by YSL M7 imagery by homosexual Tom Ford. 

Lads Mags

I saw this at a junction of Channel 5's The Wright Stuff yesterday. Despite many things, Matthew Wright does seem to be an advocate of young Men. Of course as this statement does not favour women, and despite its government source, it will carry no weight. 

Circumcision

I have expressed myself previously on this matter and it raises its vile head from time to time. More recently, a colleague was happily discussing the violation of his baby boy and how he didn't even scream when he was violated. I didn't like to point out that baby boys often go into shock with such a barbaric practice. I know it has its advocates and I know that there are those who advocate it on hygiene grounds and I know that there are wimmin who feel it perfectly acceptable whilst beating their hairy breasts over female genital mutilation. (The term female circumcision was altered to dis-associate itself from a seemingly acceptable practice. Let's face it the term Female Genital Mutilation is much more powerful and serves the purpose much better. But I'm not about wimmins issues. There are far more people battling their inequalities and good luck to them.  Why do we not afford the term mutilation to baby boys? I just wondered as it is flesh being cut of an unconsenting human being. Surely that is mutilation? Of course it is. But we don't want to upset the sensibilities of some religious groups (jews). In fact in one case in the US they actually supported the mother of a 12 year old boy whose father had decided he wanted him mutilated as he had converted to judaism.  Fear of a backlash and legal challenge the jews supported the mother. God bless em. 

Violated in Asda

I went to the supermarket Wednesday night. My parents need a new vacuum cleaner so I was checking out prices and especially the weight of them.  A late middle aged woman was there with what seemed to be her elderly mother. She was discussing the weight of vacuums and was looking at the same brand as me. I offered to pick it up from the shelf so she could feel its weight. Upon the back of this kind offering, the woman accepted and then proceeded on this endless discussion about the vacuum she had recently bought and the problems she had encountered with it.  Being a very polite person (its true dear readers, satire aside, a real gentleman) I politely listened and nodded at appropriate junctions of the conversation, during which, the woman took it upon herself to continually touch me. First it was the shoulder and then the chest and stomach and arm and shoulder again and stomach and so on and so on.

I was getting quite angry as this woman was just being a pervert. I mean I have to apply any logic that would apply to a man. It got me thinking how inappropriate this violation was and how as a man I was required to just take it. I couldn't slap her like a woman could, (although I beg to differ) there was nowhere to turn. The police would laugh, men would laugh, women would laugh indeed how we all laughed!  I am duty bound to accept female violation of space and boundaries as by product of being a man.

We have to assume that she was not getting sexually aroused during this violation, and even if she was and it had been obvious, nobody would expect me to make anything of it.  I'm just required to take this on the chin. Like the times when men are objectified on tv and woman are looking to the camera raising  an eyebrow as though its ok, I've seem it all before. Like when older women (pedos) have sex with under age boys and society deems it acceptable.

I'll be really honest, the passionate person in me wanted to punch her lights out. How the fuck dare she think it ok to touch me at all never mind flitting between shoulder chest and stomach? I would never disrespect a woman in such a way.  Can you imagine how my touching a strange womans' shoulder stomach and chest would be perceived? Maybe then people would pay attention. The police would be interested, the store detectives would intervene, machismo would come to her aid and my name would be printed in the local press listed as a pervert. But no, I eventually had to put my shopping basket between us and back away discreetly as this violation never seemed to end. Yet politely, I shrugged my shoulders as she eventually decided to check Argos or something and left me to my shopping.

Just a response to more misandry from the Gaurdian.  Surprisingly Misogyny was the opening word, shocker! 

04/08/2013
18:17

Misandry, unlike misogyny, would never be the first word on an article about Misandry. Indeed, despite the frequency and acceptability of misandry, it is a word that rarely enters into everyday language, especially amongst the  misandryious media that exists within the UK. Indeed, misandry is promoted by columnists of this newspaper and given kudos by the rantings of those misandrysts who are given column space to articles such as Bindell's 'Why I hate men"  


There is a romantic notion attached to women that just doesn't sit well in an enlightened era where we hear more and more of the women who commit domestic violence, sexually violate men and children, who steal, commit all manner of crimes, who drink and drive, who abuse children so much that the NSPCC had to hide the fact on its website that more women abused children than men.  But I pity those who stand up to this, as the Director of Kidscape had to endure some horrendous abuse when she highlighted the problem of female padeos. Indeed, Greer proffered the notion of the acceptabilty of female paedophillia by suggesting that the boy is asking for it if he becomes aroused. Thankfully, even the UK government has outlawed this kind of thought process. 


Unsurprisingly, the Guardian reported on the baby boy who was flushed down the toilet as an accidental birth, despite the lack of umbilical cord and after birth.  The Guardian just could not believe a women could do it. We exist in a world where the demonisation of men is acceptable in all arenas. Violence towards male has become so endemic within or culture that is is treated as a humourous by product of life, something to laugh at.


The person who referred to Robin Thickes video ...... and? Your point is? We endure the sexualisation of men daily, in popular TV like soaps, dramas documentaries and comedies. Nude shoots for girly magazines are never discussed. Topless men  naked men are unsurpassed by the notion of female exploitation and ignored as a by product of the myths of female objectification. Indeed, we have become so desensitised to the male nude, and ignore it as a cheeky and un-invasive due to pre-conceived notions of acceptabilty, boundaries and an assumption that he is comfortable being objectified. I had to overcome this only last week as the topless bartender at Revolution had to endure screams of delight and had to be groped by his female audience


Back to the point, women demand so much air space it is at epedemic levels. Indeed so much so that the utterance of women in practically every sentence in popular media has become the norm. And of course when you point out some little facts that favour women it is accepted with greedy open arms without any question to the source, Prove facts that favour men and the source is questionable and myth is generated to justify the female perspective being somehow more important. On a daily basis, men are threatened on Twitter, Facebook et al. No outrage there. indeed no airspace proffered to this acceptable bi-product of using anonymous social media to express yourself. 
Genital mutilation of boys is ignored and when the BBC dares to discuss it, they turn it into a womens’ issue and dwell on the mothers guilt and not the experience of the baby boy, completely overlooking this vile practice and seek un-found and disproved medical benefits as a justification. Misandry!  (Men’s Hour), yet so much time is afforded to female genital mutilation equally a babrbaric ritual that stems the age of time, but the middle class western women adopt this with so much vigour one would imagine they were the victim of it themselves. 


We still to this day hear talk of women and the vote. Despite a centuary of this rhetoric, does a women ever quote the fact that the million men who died in the 1418 war did not have the vote? Of course not. Feminism is a lottery win that the greedy recipients will not share. Because if you share inequality you loose some of the credability of your objections and thus deny yourself the sole victim which you so love to wallow in. 

KFC (USA)

Kick her in the cunt!

Fantastic work the  American brothers ( and supporters elsewhere)  who strived to get this advert ditched. Indeed now it has an age verification on Youtube and was dropped by KFC

You don't need a lecture here.   All violence is unacceptable, ESPECIALLY this type of so called comedic harmless fun used in TV. If you think it is harmless go and wash your dirty little vagina. If you have balls and think it's ok, such machismo gains nothing and is probably due to a collection of brain cells equal to the number of bollocks you possess. 

Keep up the work men!



http://www.change.org/petitions/kentucky-fried-chicken-stop-making-light-of-domestic-violence?utm_source=supporter_message&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=petition_message_notice

Mecca Bingo - Even more sexism on British TV

OBJECT

Yet another advert using sexual imagery to sell its product and yes, its yet another bingo company. 

Now we all know that bingo is played by the gays and the girls, but the constant desire to promote gambling with the use of sexual imagery or notions of male genitals is sickening. 

Imagine an advert say for a lads mag, (those horrible nasty lads) and there promoting SKY Gambling is an oiled up a female model and she holds a watermelon to her groin with a big gash in it. It could almost look like a vagina without actually being one. Then of course, Tilly from Ipswich will be rubbing one off before complaining to OFCOM about sexist misogyny, inappropriate talk, crotch fondling, rape and genital warts, so would her venom be. Yet for me and many other men who are wakening to the clear double standard, no more a roll of the eyes but actually acting. (See KFC post above).  Even the outcry from both men and women about the Bertolli pervert advert failed to get action but we are getting there. Indeed, OFCOM informed me that there had been a huge negative reaction to the advert. So thumbs up all round especially the sisters.

But the matter doesnt rest there. The increase of perceived stories in soaps and adverts involving male genitalia is at epidemic levels I mean:

Coronation Street, the local men are coerced to do a full monty to raise money for charity. Cue many lines about penis size and even, wait for it, mothers sat at the front of the audience watching the men including her son in the strip group? WTF?

Eastenders, a young man decides to be circumcised (male genital mutilation) to get the jewish princess.

Foxy Bingo, Scotsman exposes his genitals to a bus full of women.

Jackpotjoy Bingo, Old tart Windsor and three men in kilts, a windmachine starts to blow the intention of which is to see who is completely naked underneath.

Thomas Cook and James nesbitt has an accident with his trunks allegedly revealling himself to a family of annoyed and disgusted people including a child who is looking traumatised. Cue the hunk flashing his tits before warning Nesbitt to keep his trunks fastened. 

All this drivel is overlooked and ignored because of apathetic men. Sorry brothers. You need to get your thumb out of your ass! (How American!)

Do you really want to live in a world where this is acceptable only to men? Are we supposed to ignore sexist objectification because its a man? Indeed, if that is so what does that tell us about the perception of men. Disposable? Well yes ask the 7 million men who died in WWII.   Or are we suggesting that he is superior and that he should not feel vulnerable, embarrassed and exposed?  I strongly believe BOTH!

MEN BLAMED FOR SLUTTY BEHAVIOUR OF WOMAN AT MTV AWARDS

 Whore?

 Slut walk?

 Slag?

Not asking for it?

Recently, Justin Bieber declared he was growing up by behaving all arsey and aggressive to prove he is turning into a man and to disassociate himself from the child star. He has images of himself masturbating on the internet, sexually aroused, and more recently pictures  taken of the (Alien looking) lad naked in front of his grandmother. 

Nice Justin.

Then former Hannah Montanna performer Miley Cirus equally detaches herself from her child persona and expresses herself to the world as a grown up by demonstrating she has reached sexual maturity (Ahem!!) She does not masturbate to the camera and she does not go fully naked. However, she does behave like a woman and expresses her sexuality in the above slutty way and wait for it...... men are to blame!

So on that basis, we can assume Biebers fans are responsible for his jerk off and his grandmother responsible for his naked guitar playing? Of course not. Its just the usual misandryious rhetoric usually from 'women' who feel their vagina gives them right to speak on behalf of other women and demand they behave in a certain way. Therefore when sluts like Cirus behave like slags, they cannot comprehend that she is maybe acting in a way that SHE wants to. That no man is guilty of pushing her into this. That society may have pre-conceived notions of female sexuality  (not male?? REALLY??) but there isn't a person holding a gun to her head. No! You see the small un-prespresentative group of wimmin who feel they can speak for all of womankind and indeed mankind, and direct the behaviours of free men and women in accordance with their beliefs are just wrong. And woman after woman proves the point.  Feminism doesn't exist in the real world, but in the cosy world of the spoilt ugly, misandryious, middle class little bitches or lesbians, whose privilege is handed on a plate to them by men BECAUSE they are wimmin yet feel they have had to 'battle' for their privilage. 

Ironically, this matter was discussed on Channel 5's The Wright Stuff today and as usual, 'maleblame' was the first port of call. Reference was made to the respectable way men present themselves and conduct themselves at such events, but was quick, on the back of this observation, to accuse men of being to blame.


 No reference was made to plethora of female lead acts who, due to their enormous homosexual followers, have handsome athletic male dancers wearing next to nothing. So any argument about that is just ignored. We have to assume women aren't aroused by topless men........ yeah right! 

Wake up men!

Woman sought for gouging out they eyes of a 6 year old boy in China.

 Innocent child.

Distraught, father. 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2402741/Parents-horror-Chinese-boy-6-eyes-GOUGED-OUT-kidnapped-organ-trafficker-stole-corneas.html

I'm really starting to love this man

This amazing man is Peter Lloyd. Just look at him. Marvel at him. You see Mr Lloyd writes for the Daily Mail and wait for it...... he's a masculist. This young man is a breakthrough that we have waited for.  A voice for men that is in the mainstream.

To happen upon this man fills me with elation. Somebody on our side. Gentleman, behold, a king has been crowned. 


Catch him on twatter...  @handsomecopy

Gays in the Military A major re-think thanks to Mr Lloyd.

Somebody I was following on Twatter (albeit for a day)  had a go at me for a tweet I posted about gays in the military. He was a gay masculist (opens arms to a brother and gives him a massive hug!!) 

Let me use my blog to stress my point. For those regular readers, you may want to jog on as its going to get real boring. You see I am really split in two on this matter...........


Throughout time, men have been forced to war. Their sexual orientation was irrelevant and was not a considered factor when they were hoodwinked from their lives. So it makes sense that to me it doesn't matter what a man does in bed. When I'm fortunate enough to be able to select men and to offer their lives for another (usually mens but not exclusively) mans war. 

Men are as different and varied as women, its just that society bundles them all into a box labelled man (or misogynist hey girls??) and does what it will with him.

There was a time when society encouraged the demonisation and bullying on gay men, now its just white straight men who you can do that to.

Today, there is still some descent towards true equality and that is where the problem lies. Things that are not the same cannot be the same despite how you legislate.  

But the main problem for me is that nobody ever considers the rights of, in this instance, heterosexual men. What if they just don't want to share the most intimate moments of living with a group of men with those who may be sexually attracted to them? The exact same reason men and women are kept apart. What if a straight man is uncomfortable in that arena? Legislation cannot make you think in a way that suits the currently held belief. I don't want any of my brothers to be uncomfortable in any situation because of his sex or sexuality. 


But........  shit. SHIT!!!!  Hang on. What am I doing? What am I saying? Are the gay brothers not brothers? Are they not the people who have to face their own discrimination just like hetero men? Modern man doesn't give a shiny shite if the man sat next to him is gay or not. As long (and its fair to say) that boundaries are understood. Indeed my big butch work colleagues bezzy mate is gay. They go on holiday together, get pissed together, go on the pull together (ish), and in no doubt, their fore fathers will have faced the battlefields during 2000 years of developing the world we inhabit.

What about this?

Can we forgive them or be envious. Gay men and their sexuality is applauded and embraced, their sexuality is not derided in the mainstream like heterosexual men. Surely it is this acceptance that hetero men want. To be able to express himself without somebody called Ann pointing at her vagina and suggesting that it is somehow wrong, whilst wallowing in her own sexuality. 

Did Julius Caesar not marry his house boy? Was Greek culture not so that a more mature man would court a young man until he was 25 and this was perceived to be a necessary passage of rights. Pederasty was an interesting passage of rights that was somehow the norm (read up on it before criticising).

In fact the more I think about it, celebrating male sexuality is in order and big style. A small group of vocal women are working hard to demonise young men and their sexuality. Lets show that scum we are not taking their shit any more.

Have a good day now. 

A MUST READ

NOT SEXIST!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2389252/The-demonisation-lads-mags-isnt-equality-respect-Its-sexist-assault-healthy-male-masculinity-says-writer-Peter-Lloyd.html

BBC Promotes Sexual Objectification of Men

It's a lazy sunday morning and I find myself flicking through the channels. Dr Who was showing on Watch so I settled in and before I knew the scene above was presented to the world. 


It's Christmas day and we are witnessing a family carrying out preperations. At the very front of the screen we see a christmas card on which is  exposed torso of a sexy muscled torso santa. 

I feel that this image reinforces the notion of the acceptability of the sexualised imagery of men. The oh so matter of fact way that something like this is deemed acceptable and indeed permitted. Imagine if it had been a sexy female santa clause. Would the BBC have allowed such an image to be displayed in what is a children's programme? Of course not and nor should they.  Yes cards like this exist and yes they are exchanged by people. Equally so are images of women scantily clad in outfits akin to the fake christmas season. My argument is that in order to achieve full equality in all arenas, the British media should employ the same standard to all such matters where if the genders were reversed the image would not be permitted. That's all. It's really really simple isn't it. 

It's worth noting that in this episode, June Whitfield plays an old lush and demands a picture with the Dr and feels his arse.  Anybody bothered?

Remember that it was the brother programme Torchwood in which homosexual Russel T Davies wanted a naked man and argued with the BBC citing that 'every time I turn the TV on there are womens bottoms everywhere."  (BBC DR WHO Confidential) Another example of fake memory in order to further the homosexual  and "feminist" agenda! 

REAL MEN GET RAPED

Real men get raped. Always have done always will do.  As any normal man will tell you, when a man is sexually violated he does not talk about it. There is little in the way of support for him.

In conversations with women, they would invariably suggest they have been the victim of rape or sexual assault of some description. After all, how can you be the victim unless you allege something has happened. Whereas a man would not suggest it even if he has, He does not want to be seen as weak, vulnerable or any kind of victim. He does not have tribalistic tendancies when it comes to showing weakness. He doesn't want to be seen as a homosexual!  He will however be more likely to big up the number of sexual assignations he has had, or how many pints he had or indeed when he has a black eye, you should see the other guy!!!!! 

But the figures for male rape are quite startling in view of the understanding that most crimes would go un-reported against womens 80% reporting. 

Interesting article from the Guardian of all newspapers. Come on Guardian, this isn't about women its men!!! You ok??

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/mar/17/stern-review-male-rape